2024 Proxy Statement and
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12 | |
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ☒ | ||||||
| No fee required. | |||||
☐ |
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||||
☐ |
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
2024 Proxy Statement and
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To be held on April 24, 201830, 2024
at 9:00 a.m. (CDT)
To the Stockholders:
Notice is hereby given that the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Stepan Company (the “Company”) will be held at the Company’s Administrative and Research Centeroffices at Edens Expressway and Winnetka Road, Northfield,1101 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois 60062, on Tuesday, April 24, 2018,30, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. (CDT), for the following purposes:
1. | To elect three |
2. | To |
3. | To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for |
4. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
The Board of Directors has designated the close of business on February 26, 2018,March 4, 2024, as the record date for determining the holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.
The Board of Directors extends a cordial invitation to all stockholders to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please mark, sign and mail the enclosed proxy card in the return envelope provided or vote by internet or phone as promptly as possible.
As a reminder, your broker may not vote your shares for non-routine matters such as the election of Directorsdirectors or the Say-on-Pay vote without your specific instructions as to how to vote. Therefore, we urge you to provide your broker with voting instructions by returning your proxy card so your votevotes for all proposals can be counted.
Directions to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders are available at http:https://www.stepan.com, under “Investor Relations—Annual Meeting”stepan.gcs-web.com/annual-meeting for those stockholders who plan to attend the Annual Meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors,
JENNIFER ANSBRO HALESecretaryDAVID G. KABBES
Northfield,Secretary
Northbrook, Illinois
March 29, 201826, 2024
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on April 24, 201830, 2024
The Company’s Proxy Statement, 20172023 Annual Report to Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172023, are available at http://www.edocumentview.com/SCL.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| 1 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 5 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| 10 | ||||
| 11 | ||||
Policies and Procedures for Approving Related Person Transactions | 11 | |||
Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons | 11 | |||
| 12 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 12 | ||||
| 13 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 14 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 15 | ||||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 17 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 18 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| 19 | ||||
| 20 | ||||
| 20 | ||||
| 20 | ||||
Role of the Committee and Executives in Establishing Executive Compensation | 21 | |||
| 21 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
| 22 | ||||
i
| 23 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 31 | ||||
| 32 | ||||
| 32 | ||||
| 32 | ||||
| 33 | ||||
| 34 | ||||
| 34 | ||||
| 36 | ||||
| 37 | ||||
| 40 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| 43 | ||||
| 44 | ||||
| 46 | ||||
| 47 | ||||
| 50 | ||||
| 50 | ||||
| 50 | ||||
| 50 | ||||
Stock Awards and Incentive Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors | 50 | |||
| 51 | ||||
| 51 | ||||
| 51 | ||||
Proposal No. 2: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation | 52 | |||
| 54 | ||||
| 55 | ||||
| 55 | ||||
| 56 | ||||
| 57 | ||||
| 57 | ||||
| 58 | ||||
Appendix A: Explanations of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures | A-1 | |||
ii
PROXY STATEMENT
For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
STEPAN COMPANY
Edens Expressway and Winnetka Road1101 Skokie Boulevard
Northfield,
Northbrook, Illinois 6009360062
To be held at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) on April 24, 201830, 2024
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors, and the Company will bear the entire expense of solicitation. Such solicitation is being made by mail, and the Company’s officers and employees may solicit proxies from stockholders personally or by telephone, mail or other means. The Company will make arrangements with the brokers, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries who request the forwarding of solicitation material to the beneficial owners of shares of the Company’s stock held of record by such brokers, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries, and the Company will reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. This proxy statement and proxy are first being distributed to stockholders commencing on or about March 29, 2018.26, 2024.
At the close of business on February 26, 2018,March 4, 2024, the record date for the meeting, there were 22,536,30522,464,074 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Common Stock”) outstanding, each share of which is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted on at the meeting. The required quorum at the Annual Meeting is a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock as of the record date.
If you submit your proxy but abstain from voting on one or more matters, your shares will be counted as present at the meeting for the purposes of determining a quorum. You may revoke your proxy by attending the meeting and voting in person or by delivering to the Secretary of the Company a revocation of the proxy or an executed new proxy bearing a later date.
You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on each of the nominees for the Board of Directors andDirectors. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on each of the other proposals. If you vote to “ABSTAIN” with respect to a nominee for the Board of Directors, or ayour abstention will not be included in the vote totals and will not affect the outcome of the vote. If you vote to “ABSTAIN” with respect to any other proposal, your abstention will have the same effect asof a vote against that nominee orthe proposal.
For any other business that may properly come before the meeting, votes will be cast pursuant to the authority granted by the enclosed proxy in accordance with the best judgment of the individuals acting under the proxy. The Board of Directors is not currently aware of any other business that may come before the meeting.
If you submit your proxy but abstain from voting on one or more matters, your shares will be counted as present at the meeting for the purposes of determining a quorum. Your shares also will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of calculating the vote on the particular matter with respect to which you abstained from voting. You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the meeting.
If you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, custodian, nominee or other fiduciary, your shares with respect to such matters will not be voted on any non-routine matters and will be considered “broker non-votes.” Non-routine matters include the election of Directorsdirectors and the Say-on-Pay vote. Your broker may vote your shares without instruction on the ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Broker non-votes will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum.quorum but will not be included in the vote totals for non-routine matters and will not affect the outcome of those votes. Please instruct your broker or bank so your vote can be counted on all proposals.
The required quorum at the Annual Meeting is a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s voting stock as of the record date.
1
In order to ensure the necessary quorum at the Annual Meeting, please mark, sign and return the enclosed proxy promptly in the envelope provided. You may also vote via the internet by visiting http://www.envisionreports.com/SCL or by phone by calling (800) 652-8683. Internet and phone voting will be available 24 hours a day, seven days a week until 11:59 p.m.1:00 a.m. (EDT) on April 23, 2018.30, 2024. If voting via the internet or by phone, please have your proxy card available and follow the instructions to vote. Even if you vote prior to the meeting, you are invited to attend the meeting.
In the future, in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company may furnish proxy materials, including its proxy statements and annual reports, to stockholders by providing access to these documents on the internet instead of mailing printed copies. MostIf the Company elects to take this approach, most stockholders willwould not receive printed copies of the proxy materials. Instead, the notice willwould provide instructions on how to access and review the proxy materials on the internet. The notice willwould also provide instructions on how to submit your proxy via the internet. For stockholders who prefer to receive printed copies of the proxy materials, the notice willwould provide instructions for requesting printed copies.
2
PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Stockholders and the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote, pursuant to the authority granted by the stockholder in the enclosed proxy, on the election of Mr. Randall S. Dearth, Mr. Gregory E. LawtonMs. Susan M. Lewis and Ms. Jan Stern Reed as Directorsdirectors of the Company, to hold office until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2021.2027. The Board of Directors is divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. Directors for each class are elected at the Annual Meetingannual meeting of Stockholdersstockholders in the year in which the term for their class expires. Mr. Dearth, Mr. LawtonMs. Lewis and Ms. Reed are current Directorsdirectors whose terms expire in 2018. Messrs.2024. Mr. Dearth and LawtonMs. Reed were last elected by the Company’s stockholders at the 20152021 Annual Meeting andMeeting. Ms. ReedLewis was elected by the Board of Directors on October 20, 2015.February 15, 2024. The nominations of Mr. Dearth, Mr. LawtonMs. Lewis and Ms. Reed have each been reviewed and recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors.
It is with great sadness that the Board of Directors and the Company acknowledge the death of Gregory E. Lawton on August 18, 2023. Mr. Lawton had been a director since 2006. The Board of Directors and the Company wish to honor the memory of Mr. Lawton and the valuable leadership and guidance he provided.
In the event any of such nomineesMr. Dearth, Ms. Lewis and Ms. Reed is unable to serve as Director,director, votes will be cast, pursuant to the authority granted in the proxy, for such person or persons as may be designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors at this time is not aware of any nominee who is or will be unable to serve as Director,director, if elected.
Under the Company’s Amended and Restated By-laws, in an uncontested election Directorsdirectors are elected by a majority of the votes cast by stockholders. An uncontested election of Directorsdirectors means an election for which the number of nominees does not exceed the number of Directorsdirectors to be elected at the specific election. Because three Directorsdirectors are to be elected, and Mr. Dearth, Mr. LawtonMs. Lewis and Ms. Reed are the sole nominees, this election is uncontested, and therefore the nominees must receive a majority of votes cast by stockholders to be elected.
Nominees for Director
The following table sets forth certain information about the nominees for Director:director:
|
|
| |||||
Age: 60 Director Since: 2012 |
| Experience | |||||
|
Qualifications Mr. Dearth also previously served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of LANXESS Corporation, a global chemicals manufacturer, and of Calgon Carbon Corporation, a global manufacturer of activated carbon and innovative treatment
| ||||||
3
|
| |||||
Age: 59 Director Since: 2024 |
|
Principal of Susan Lewis Consulting LLC, a business and executive consulting firm, from March 2021 through July 2023. Senior Vice President, Qualifications Ms. Lewis spent over 30 years at Dow Inc., a materials science company, with operations, environmental, health and safety, sustainability and risk management responsibilities. Ms. Lewis brings the Board of
|
| |||
Jan Stern Reed | ||||||
Age: 64 Director Since: 2015 | Experience Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., a global pharmacy-led, health and wellbeing enterprise, from February 2015 to February 2016. Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Walgreen Co. from October 2014 to February 2015.
|
| Qualifications |
| ||
PROPOSAL: The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote FOR the election of Mr. Randall S. Dearth, Mr. Gregory E. LawtonMs. Lewis and Ms. Jan Stern Reed to the Board of Directors, each for a three-year term.
4
Continuing Directors Whose Terms ContinueAre Not Expiring
The following table sets forth certain information about those Directorsdirectors who are not up for election as their respective terms of office do not expire this year:election:
Name of Director |
| Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Other Directorships During the Past Five Years, and Age |
| Year of First Selection as Director |
| Term Expires |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Boyce |
| Chairman of PQ Corporation, a global specialty chemical and catalyst company, from 2005 to 2017. Chief Executive Officer of PQ Corporation from 2005 to May 2015. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Peak Investments, an operating and acquisition company, since 1998. Director of AAR Corporation. Age – 70 |
| 2010 |
| 2019 |
Joaquin Delgado |
| Executive Vice President, Consumer Business Group of 3M Company, a global diversified technology company, since 2016. Executive Vice President, Health Care Business Group of 3M Company, from 2012 to 2016. Age – 58 |
| 2011 |
| 2020 |
F. Quinn Stepan |
| Chairman of the Company from November 1984 to December 2016. Chief Executive Officer of the Company from November 1984 to December 2005. Age – 80 |
| 1967 |
| 2019 |
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. |
| Chairman of the Company since January 2017. President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 2006. Age – 57 |
| 1999 |
| 2020 |
Edward J. Wehmer |
| President and Chief Executive Officer of Wintrust Financial Corporation, a financial services company, since May 1998. Director of Wintrust Financial Corporation. Age – 63 |
| 2003 |
| 2019 |
Scott R. Behrens | ||
Age: 54 Director Since: 2022 Term Expires: 2025 | Experience President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since April 2022. President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from January 2021 through April 2022. Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants of the Company from September 2014 through December 2020. Qualifications Mr. Behrens has served the Company for 30 years, including as general manager of the Company’s largest business segment, Surfactants. The Board believes that Mr. Behrens provides key insight into the Company’s day-to-day operations and strategic direction. | |
Lorinda A. Burgess | ||
Age: 61 Director Since: 2021 Term Expires: 2025 | Experience Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Americas Region of Medtronic Inc., a medical technology company, from March 2015 through June 2023. Director of AngioDynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANGO). Qualifications Ms. Burgess spent 25 years at Medtronic and retired as a regional chief financial officer. She provides the Board of Directors with financial expertise and with broad operational and strategic experience developed throughout her career in a range of financial leadership roles. | |
5
Family Relationships
Joaquin Delgado | ||
Age: 64 Director Since: 2011 Term Expires: 2026 | Experience Executive Vice President, Consumer Business Group of 3M Company, a global diversified technology company, from July 2016 to July 2019. Executive Vice President, Health Care Business Group of 3M Company, from October 2012 to July 2016. Trustee of each of Goldman Sachs Trust, Goldman Sachs Trust II, Goldman Sachs ETF Trust, Goldman Sachs ETF Trust II, Goldman Sachs Variable Insurance Trust, and Goldman Sachs Real Estate Diversified Income Fund, each of which is registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Qualifications Dr. Delgado also held other executive leadership positions at 3M Company and holds a doctorate in polymer science and engineering. Dr. Delgado provides the Board of Directors with chemistry and innovation expertise and global business, operational, manufacturing, marketing and corporate development experience. | |
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. | ||
Age: 63 Director Since: 1999 Term Expires: 2026 | Experience Chairman of the Company since January 2017. Chief Executive Officer of the Company from January 2006 through April 2022. President of the Company from February 1999 through December 2020. Qualifications In his over 30-year career with the Company, Mr. Stepan served in a number of positions of increasing responsibility and in a variety of functions within the Company’s operations. Mr. Stepan’s leadership provides the Board of Directors with extensive knowledge of the Company’s strategy and operations. | |
Edward J. Wehmer | ||
Age: 70 Director Since: 2003 Term Expires: 2025 | Experience Executive Chairman, Founder and Senior Advisor of Wintrust Financial Corporation, a financial services company, since May 2023. Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Wintrust Financial Corporation from February 2020 through April 2023. President and Chief Executive Officer of Wintrust Financial Corporation from May 1998 to February 2020. Director of Wintrust Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: WTFC). Qualifications Mr. Wehmer is also a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Wehmer provides the Board of Directors with expertise in strategic, financial, banking and accounting matters. Mr. Wehmer also has extensive experience with acquisitions. | |
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. is the son of F. Quinn Stepan.6
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
As of March 2, 2018,4, 2024, the following persons were the only persons known to the Company to beneficially own more than five percent of the Company’s Common Stock, other than members of the Company’s Board of Directors or management, whose ownership is set forth in the table below:
Name and Address |
| Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
| Percentage of Outstanding Shares of Common Stock (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc. (2) |
| 2,608,541 |
| 11.6% |
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (3) |
| 2,142,106 |
| 9.5% |
| Name and Address | Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned | Percentage of Outstanding Shares of Common Stock (1) | ||||||
| ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. (2) | 3,498,133 | 15.6% | ||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (3) | 2,562,730 | 11.4% | ||||||
State Street Corporation (4) | 1,212,248 | 5.4% | ||||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (5) | 1,201,147 | 5.3% | ||||||
(1) | Based on |
(2) | As reported in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January |
(3) | As reported in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February |
| (4) | As reported in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 24, 2024, by State Street Corporation (“State Street”), State Street Financial Center, 1 Congress Street, Suite 1, Boston, Massachusetts 02114. In the Schedule 13G/A, State Street reported that, as of December 31, 2023, it had shared voting power as to 1,137,499 shares of Common Stock and shared dispositive power as to 1,212,248 shares of Common Stock. |
| (5) | As reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2024, by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”), 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One, Austin, Texas 78746. In the Schedule 13G, Dimensional reported that, as of December 29, 2023, it had sole voting power as to 1,177,693 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power as to 1,201,147 shares of Common Stock. |
Security Ownership of the Board of Directors and Management
The following table sets forth, as of March 2, 2018,4, 2024, the security ownership of each currently serving Executive Officerexecutive officer listed in the Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement, each Directordirector and nominee for Director,director, and all Directorscurrently serving directors and Executive Officersexecutive officers as a group. The address for each Director,
7
director, nominee for Director,director, and Executive Officerexecutive officer is c/o Stepan Company, Edens Expressway and Winnetka Road, Northfield,1101 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois 60093.60062.
Name |
| Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1) |
| Percentage of Outstanding Shares of Common Stock (1) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Scott R. Behrens |
| 42,721 | (2) |
| * | |
Michael R. Boyce. |
| 11,881 | (3) |
| * | |
Randall S. Dearth |
| 8,823 | (4) |
| * | |
Joaquin Delgado |
| 8,654 |
|
| * | |
Jennifer Ansbro Hale |
| 4,023 | (5) |
| * | |
Gregory E. Lawton |
| 24,928 | (6) |
| * | |
Arthur W. Mergner |
| 47,480 | (7) |
| * | |
Jan Stern Reed |
| 3,334 |
|
| * | |
F. Quinn Stepan |
| 1,297,345 | (8) |
| 5.8% | |
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. |
| 859,854 | (9) |
| 3.8% | |
Edward J. Wehmer |
| 24,139 | (10) |
| * | |
All Directors and Executive Officers |
| 2,832,567 | (11) |
| 12.6% | |
| Name | Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1) | Percentage of Outstanding Shares of Common Stock (1) | ||||||
Scott R. Behrens | 48,876 (2) | * | ||||||
Lorinda A. Burgess | 3,334 | * | ||||||
Randall S. Dearth | 11,517 (3) | * | ||||||
Joaquin Delgado | 12,175 | * | ||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | 581 (4) | * | ||||||
David G. Kabbes | 15,972 (5) | * | ||||||
Susan M. Lewis | — | * | ||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | 27,369 (6) | * | ||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | 30,819 (7) | * | ||||||
Jan Stern Reed | 10,015 | * | ||||||
Luis E. Rojo | 22,586 (8) | * | ||||||
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. | 899,220 (9) | 4.0% | ||||||
Edward J. Wehmer | 23,570 (10) | * | ||||||
All Directors and Executive Officers | 1,564,586 (11) | 7.0% | ||||||
| * | Less than one percent of outstanding shares of Common Stock. |
(1) | Based on |
|
(3) | Includes |
|
|
| Includes (a) |
| (5) | Includes (a) 338 shares of Common Stock allocated to Mr. Kabbes under ESOP II and (b) 7,967 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Kabbes has the right to acquire through the exercise of stock options granted pursuant to the Company’s incentive compensation |
8
(6) |
|
| Includes (a) |
| Includes (a) |
|
|
| Includes |
| (9) | Includes (a) 177,150 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Stepan has the right to acquire through the exercise of stock options granted pursuant to the Company’s incentive compensation plans, (b) 6,916 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Stepan has the right to acquire through the exercise of SARs granted pursuant to the Company’s incentive compensation plans, and (c) 76,920 shares of Common Stock credited to Mr. Stepan’s stock account under the Management Incentive Plan. |
| (10) | Includes 14,225 shares of Common Stock credited to Mr. Wehmer’s account pursuant to the Company’s incentive compensation plans. |
(11) | As of March |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2017, about the Company’s securities that may be issued under the Company’s existing equity compensation plans, all of which have been approved by the stockholders:
Plan Category |
| Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
| Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
| Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| (a) |
|
| (b) |
|
| (c) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
| 869,013 (1) |
|
|
| $54.97 |
|
|
| 945,161 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
Total |
|
| 869,013 |
|
|
| $54.97 |
|
|
| 945,161 |
(1)Includes unvested stock awards as awarded by the Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors.
SECTIONDelinquent Section 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEReports
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the rules thereunder require the Company’s Executive Officers, Directors,executive officers, directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of the Common Stock, to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of Common Stock with the SEC. Based solely upon a review of such reports filed with the SEC and written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that all such required reports have been timely filed, other than a report due by Mr. Scott BehrensF. Quinn Stepan, Jr. reporting shares acquired underby Mr. Stepan’s father pursuant to a Company compensation plan as the resultdistribution of performancedeferred shares vesting on February 21, 2017,2, 2023, which form was inadvertently filed late due to administrative error.
9
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2023, about the Company’s securities that may be issued under the Company’s existing equity compensation plans, all of which have been approved by the stockholders:
| Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||
| ||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 1,266,844 (1) | $ 93.02 (2) | 716,012 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||
|
|
| ||||
Total | 1,266,844 | $ 93.02 | 716,012 | |||
|
|
| ||||
| (1) | Includes unvested performance share awards, with the number of performance shares based on the probable number of shares that will ultimately vest given the projected level of performance. |
| (2) | Excludes unvested performance share awards. |
10
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Policies and Procedures for Approving Related Person Transactions
The Company has adopted a written policy entitled “Stepan Company Related“Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures.”Policy” (the “Related Party Transaction Policy”). The policy was initially approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors in February 2007, has been annually reviewed by the Audit Committee and was last amended in April 2017 (“Related Party Transaction Policy”).2021. This policy applies to material transactions (“Related Party Transactions”) involving the Company and a Related Party, which is defined as a person or entity who is a Company executive officer, Director,director, nominee for election as a Director,director, beneficial owner of five percent or more of the Company’s Common Stock, or immediate family member of these persons, or any entity for which any of the foregoing persons is an executive officer, general partner, managing member, principal or greater than five percent beneficial owner. The Related Party Transaction Policy states that the Company will consummate a Related Party Transaction only when the Audit Committee approves the transaction after considering the factors set forth in the Related Party Transaction Policy. If advance Audit Committee approval of a Related Party Transaction is not feasible, then the Company may preliminarily enter into the transaction upon prior approval by the ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee, subject to ratification of the transaction by the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. No Directordirector may participate in the approval of a Related Party Transaction for which he or she is a Related Party.
The factors considered by the Audit Committee in its evaluation of a Related Party Transaction include the relevant facts and circumstances of the proposed Related Party Transaction, whether the Related Party Transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s-length dealings with an unrelated third party, the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction and the conflicts of interest and corporate opportunity provisions of the Company’s Code of Conduct.
Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters and Certain Control Persons
Mr. Richard Stepan, son of F. Quinn Stepan and brother of F. Quinn Stepan, Jr., Chairman of the Board, is a current Company employee atofficer of the Company’s Northfield, Illinois offices.Company. Mr. Richard Stepan is neither an officer of the Companya director nor a Director or nominee for Director.director. As an employee of the Company, Mr. Richard Stepan receives a base salary, short-term and long-term incentive compensation as appropriate for his position and other regular and customary employee benefits generally available to all Company employees and is eligible for other limited perquisites available to employees at his level within the organization. For 2017,2023, Mr. Richard Stepan was paid a salary of $185,479, short-term incentive compensation of $60,389$329,000, and a long-term incentive compensation awardsaward of stock options,RSUs, SARs and performance shares with a target value of $55,000.$450,000. Mr. Richard Stepan also participated in other regular and customary employee benefit programs generally available to all Company employees.did not receive a short-term incentive compensation award for 2023. The Audit Committee approved the Company’s employment of Mr. Richard Stepan pursuant to the Related Party Transaction Policy and procedures described above.
11
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct
The Company is committed to having sound corporate governance principles and has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Conduct to maintain those principles. The Company’s Code of Conduct applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers Directors and employees, including the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct are available at http:https://www.stepan.com, under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.”stepan.gcs-web.com/corporate-governance/highlights. Stockholders may also request free printed copies of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct by contacting the Company’s Secretary at Stepan Company, Secretary’s Office, Edens Expressway and Winnetka Road, Northfield,1101 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois 60093.60062.
Board Committees
The Board of Directors has threefour standing committees: the Audit Committee, the CompensationCompliance Committee, the Human Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each composed entirely of independent Directors.directors. The charter of each committee is available at http:https://www.stepan.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance.”stepan.gcs-web.com/corporate-governance/highlights.
Audit Committee
The primary functions of the Audit Committee are to (a) assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities to stockholders, the investment community and creditors in relation to (i) the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, (ii) the adequacy of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, (iii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements (in coordination with the Compliance Committee), (iv) the registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence, and (v) the performance of the independent auditors and the Company’s internal audit functionfunction; and (b) prepare the Audit Committee report included in each proxy statement. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee include annual selection and engagement of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, review of the proposed fees and scope of work of the independent registered public accounting firm’s year-end audit, review with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm of the results of the year-end audits of the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, review of the Company’s financial statements with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm prior to the Company’s filing of each quarterly report on Form 10-Q and annual report on Form 10-K, review of findings reported by the Company’s internal audit department and management’s responses, review of the internal audit program of the Company and review, and approval or disapproval of Related Party Transactions pursuant to the Company’s Related Party Transaction Policy.Policy and review of the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies and procedures, including those relating to the Company’s enterprise risks, financial risks and information security risks. The Audit Committee held four meetings in 2017. 2023.
The members of the Audit Committee in 2017 were Mr. Boyce,is comprised of Ms. Burgess (Chair), Mr. Dearth, Dr. Delgado, Mr. Lawton,Ms. Lewis, Ms. Reed and Mr. Wehmer, (Chairman), all of whom are financially literate and are independent Directorsdirectors in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC and as described below under “Director Independence.” The Board of Directors has determined that each of Ms. Burgess and Mr. Wehmer is qualifiedqualifies as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC regulations.
Compensation and DevelopmentCompliance Committee
The primary functions of the Compliance Committee are to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to (a) the Company’s overall compliance with significant legal and
12
regulatory requirements, as well as (b) compliance with its business ethics policies and Code of Conduct. The Compliance Committee held four meetings in 2023.
The Compliance Committee is comprised of Ms. Burgess, Mr. Dearth (Chair), Dr. Delgado, Ms. Lewis, Ms. Reed and Mr. Wehmer, all of whom are independent directors in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and as described below under “Director Independence.”
Human Capital and Compensation Committee
The primary functions of the Human Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee are to (a) establish and administer the Company’s policies, programs and procedures for compensating its executive management and (b) provide advice and counsel to the Company regarding executive development and succession planning. The responsibilities of the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee include reviewing and setting or recommending the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, recommending and administering cash-based and equity-based incentive compensation plans, reviewing and recommending Directordirector compensation, reviewing and recommending the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in each proxy statement, and preparing the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee Report included in each proxy statement. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee also reviews and Developmentadvises management regarding the Company’s human capital management, including culture, diverse representation, inclusion and pay equity strategies, programs and initiatives. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee held three meetings in 2017.2023.
The membersHuman Capital and Compensation Committee is comprised of the Compensation and Development Committee in 2017 were Mr. Boyce,Ms. Burgess, Mr. Dearth, Dr. Delgado, Mr. Lawton (Chairman),Ms. Lewis, Ms. Reed (Chair) and Mr. Wehmer, all of whom are independent Directorsdirectors in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC and as described below under “Director Independence.”
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The primary functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are to (a) identify individuals qualified to become board members and recommend the Directordirector nominees for election at each annual meeting of stockholders, (b) develop and recommend the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, (c) oversee the evaluation of the Board of Directors and (d) recommend the members for each Board committee. In addition, the responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include making recommendations to the Board on corporate governance matters and the Board’s structure. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held fourthree meetings in 2017. 2023.
The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2017 were Mr. Boyce (Chairman),is comprised of Ms. Burgess, Mr. Dearth, Dr. Delgado Mr. Lawton,(Chair), Ms. Lewis, Ms. Reed and Mr. Wehmer, all of whom are independent Directorsdirectors in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and as described below under “Director Independence.”
In 2017, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee formed a subcommittee, consisting of Mr. Boyce (Chairman), Mr. Dearth, Dr. Delgado and Ms. Reed, to oversee certain matters on behalf of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. This subcommittee held four meetings in 2017.
Board Performance Evaluations
Annually, each Directordirector completes an evaluation of the full Board of Directors and of each standing committee on which the Directordirector serves. An independent third-party advisorThe Company’s Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary compiles the results of the assessments and provides the results to the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee, who presents the results to that Committee and to the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors initially discusses the assessment results with the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer in attendance, and if desired by any Director,director, the assessment results are also discussed at Executive Sessions of the non-management Directors.
13
directors and at Executive Sessions of the independent directors. This assessment evaluates the Board of Directors’ composition and contribution as a whole to the Company and reviews areas in which the Board of Directors and/or management believes a stronger contribution could be made. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for evaluating the performance of current members of the Board of Directors at the time they are considered for re-nomination to the Board of Directors.
Board Meetings and Attendance
During 2017,2023, the Board of Directors held fiveseven meetings. During 2017,2023, all of the Directors, except for Dr. Delgado,directors attended greatermore than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the meetings of committees or subcommittees of the Board of Directors of which each Directordirector was a member. Dr. Delgado attended 65% of such meetings. While all Directorsdirectors are encouraged to attend, the Company does not have a formal policy requiring attendance at the Company’s Annual Meetingannual meeting of Stockholders.stockholders. All Directorsdirectors attended the 20172023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in person or via remote communication. The Company currently expects that all directors and are currently expected tonominees will attend the 20182024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.Meeting.
Director Nomination Process
The Corporate Governance Guidelines contain the Board of Directors membership criteria that apply to nominees recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for a position on the Board of Directors. Under these criteria, members of the Board of Directors should possess qualities that include strength of character, an inquiring and independent mind, practical wisdom and mature judgment. In addition to these qualities, Directordirector nominees should also possess recognized achievement, an ability to contribute to some aspect of the Company’s business, and the willingness to make the commitment of time and effort required of a Director.director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating Directordirector nominees includes recommendations by stockholders, search firms, non-management Directors directors and executive officers, a review and background check of specific candidates, an assessment of the candidate’s independence under the Directordirector independence standards described below, and interviews of Directordirector candidates by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Lewis was first identified as a director candidate by a third-party search firm retained by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
It is the policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to consider candidates recommended by stockholders for membership on the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s evaluation of a nominee recommended by a stockholder would consider the general criteria and required information previously described in this section, and any other factors the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems relevant. Any stockholder recommendationsrecommendation proposed for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must comply with the requirements set forth in the Company’s By-laws. Among other things, a stockholder must give written notice containing the information required by the Company’s By-laws to the Secretary of the Company at Stepan Company, Secretary’s Office, Edens Expressway and Winnetka Road, Northfield,1101 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois 60093.60062. The deadline to submit a Directordirector recommendation for the 20192025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is set forth in the “2019“2025 Stockholder Proposals”Proposals and Director Nominations” section below.
14
Board Diversity
The following charts summarize the current composition of the Board of Directors does not have a formal policyDirectors:
|
|
|
|
In accordance with respect to diversity. However, inthe Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, when identifying Directordirector nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors consider a broad definition of diversity, includingdiversity. This definition includes, but is not limited to, diversity of professional, technical, operational, international and financial experience, skills and characteristics. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board will consider demographics such as age, race, ethnicity, gender and sexual orientation. The Board has also considered experience related to the Company’s business and industry. If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes an outside search firm to identify Directordirector nominees, it instructs the search firm to consider broadly-defined diversity in identifying potential nominees.
Director Independence
For purposes of determining Directordirector independence, the Company uses the New York Stock Exchange director independence standards. No Directordirector qualifies as “independent” unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the Directordirector has no
material relationship with the Company (either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). In addition, a Directordirector is not independent if:
The Directordirector is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of the Company, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of the Company;
The Director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any 12-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from the Company, other than Director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);
| • | The director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any 12-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from the Company, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service); |
(A) The Directordirector is a current partner or employee of a firm that is the Company’s internal auditor or independent registered public accounting firm; (B) the Directordirector has an immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm; (C) the Directordirector has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on the Company’s audit; or (D) the Directordirector or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time;
The Directordirector or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or
The Directordirector is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.
15
for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues. |
Under the New York Stock Exchange rules and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, at least a majority of the Company’s Directorsdirectors and each member of the Audit Committee, CompensationCompliance Committee, Human Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must meet the independence standards set forth above. The Board of Directors has determined, following the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that each of Mr. Boyce,Ms. Burgess, Mr. Dearth, Dr. Delgado, Mr. Lawton,Ms. Lewis, Ms. Reed and Mr. Wehmer is independent under the standards set forth above and that Mr. Lawton, prior to his passing, was independent under the standards set forth above. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the standing committees satisfies the Company’s independence standards, including the additional independence standards and financial literacy requirements required for audit committee members and compensation committee members, as applicable, established by SEC and New York Stock Exchange rules. Mr. Stepan is not deemed independent under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange because he served as an employee of the Company until April 25, 2022. Mr. Behrens is not deemed independent under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange because he currently serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
In making independence determinations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, with assistance from the Company’s legal counsel, evaluated responses to a questionnaire completed annually by each Directordirector regarding relationships and possible conflicts of interest between each Director,director, the Company and management. In its review of Directordirector independence, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered the commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and familial relationships any Directordirector may have with the Company or management. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered any relationships between the Company and entities for which any Directordirector serves as management or a member of the board of directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, that the six Directors named above be considered independent.
Mr. Stepan and Mr. Stepan, Jr. are not deemed independent under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange because Mr. Stepan was employed by the Company as its Chairman until December 2016, and Mr. Stepan, Jr. serves as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board of Directors regularly reviews its leadership structure in light of the Company’s then-current needs, trends, internal assessments of Board effectiveness, and other factors. The Board of Directors does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board because the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board.
Currently, the Board believes the interests of the Company and its stockholders are best served through a leadership model with a combinedthe roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer position and a Lead Independent Director. The current Chairman andseparated. Mr. Stepan, who served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer until April 25, 2022, continues to serve as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Behrens succeeded Mr. Stepan Jr., possesses extensive knowledgeas Chief Executive Officer and understandingis a member of the Company and its operations, strategic planning and industry, developed during his over 30-year career with the Company. Board.
The Board believes that Mr. Stepan, Jr.’sStepan’s experience puts him in the best position to provide broad leadership for the Board in the role of Chairman as itthe Board works to deliver value to stockholders. Mr. Stepan possesses extensive knowledge and understanding of the Company and its operations, strategic planning matters, and the industry in general, developed during his over 30-year career with the Company.
To aid the Board of Directors’Board’s independent oversight of the Company and management, the Board has elected Mr. Wehmer as Lead Independent Director in 2017 and re-elected him in February 2018.Director. The Board believes that the election of the Lead
Independent Director enhances the Board’s commitment to maintaining strong corporate governance and provides effective independent Board leadership. Among other responsibilities, the Lead Independent Director
16
presides at all Executive Sessions of the independent Directors,directors, advises the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer on Board meeting schedules, agendas and materials, and serves as principal liaison between the independent Directorsdirectors and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, theChairman. The Lead Independent Director, in consultation with the chairmenChairman and the chairs of the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, also leads the process for the evaluation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
In addition, the independent Directorsdirectors regularly meet in Executive Sessions without non-independent Directors orthe Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and other members of management present in accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Director Qualifications
All Directors and nominees for Director possess strong executive leadership experience derived from their positions as executives of various companies. Certain individual qualifications and skills of each Director and nominee for Director that were considered in determining that such individual should serve as a member of the Board of Directors are described below:
Mr. Stepan, Jr. has served as Chairman of the Company since January 2017 and as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 2006. In his over 30-year career with the Company, Mr. Stepan, Jr. has served in a number of positions of increasing responsibility and in a variety of functions within the Company’s operations. Mr. Stepan, Jr.’s day-today strategic leadership provides the Board of Directors with extensive knowledge of the Company’s operations.
Mr. Boyce is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PQ Corporation, a global specialty chemical and catalyst company. Mr. Boyce serves as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Peak Investments, an operating and acquisition company. Mr. Boyce also serves as a director for AAR Corporation. Mr. Boyce provides the Board of Directors with global executive leadership in the chemical industry as well as expertise in strategic business matters.
Mr. Dearth is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Calgon Carbon Corporation, a global manufacturer of activated carbon and innovative treatment systems. Mr. Dearth also serves as a director for Calgon Carbon Corporation. Prior to joining Calgon Carbon Corporation, Mr. Dearth served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of LANXESS Corporation, a global chemicals manufacturer. Mr. Dearth provides the Board of Directors with global executive leadership in the chemical industry and a global perspective on European leadership, strategy and business conditions.
Dr. Delgado is the Executive Vice President, Consumer Business Group of 3M Company, a global diversified technology company. Dr. Delgado has also held other executive leadership positions at 3M Company and holds a doctorate in polymer science and engineering. Dr. Delgado provides the Board of Directors with chemistry and innovation expertise and current global business, operational, manufacturing, marketing and corporate development experience.
Mr. Lawton is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of JohnsonDiversey, Inc., a leading global provider of cleaning and hygiene solutions to the institutional and industrial marketplace. Mr. Lawton previously held various leadership roles at other companies and also serves as a director for General Cable Corporation and American Trim, LLC. Mr. Lawton provides the Board of Directors with global expertise and executive leadership from the consumer products industry, and extensive experience with employee development.
Ms. Reed is the former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., a global pharmacy-led, health and wellbeing enterprise, as well as the Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Walgreen Co. Prior to joining Walgreens, Ms. Reed was the Executive Vice President of Human Resources, General Counsel and Secretary of Solo Cup Company. Ms. Reed also serves as a director for AngioDynamics, Inc. Ms. Reed provides the Board of Directors with global executive leadership in legal, corporate governance and strategic business matters, as well as extensive experience with risk management, compliance, acquisitions and employee development.
Mr. Stepan served as Chairman of the Company from 1984 to 2016. In his over 50-year career with the Company, Mr. Stepan held numerous positions, including Chief Executive Officer. In addition, Mr. Stepan is a director of Fermi Research Alliance, LLC, a joint partnership of the University of Chicago and the Universities Research Association. Mr. Stepan’s experience as the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer provides the Board of Directors with extensive knowledge of the Company’s history, operations and strategy.
Mr. Wehmer is President and Chief Executive Officer of Wintrust Financial Corporation, a financial services company. Mr. Wehmer is also a Certified Public Accountant and serves as a director for Wintrust Financial Corporation. Mr. Wehmer provides the Board of Directors with expertise in strategic, financial, banking and accounting matters. Mr. Wehmer also has extensive experience with acquisitions.
The Board of Directors takes an active role in overseeing the Company’s financial and non-financial risks. The Audit Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Wehmer,Ms. Burgess, leads the Board’s oversight of Company risks. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies and procedures, including those relating to the Company’s enterprise risks, financial risks and information security risks. The Audit Committee receives reports from the Company’s Director of Internal Audit, theChief Compliance and Risk Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the General Counsel, all of whom are responsible for various aspects of the Company’s risk management. The Director of Internal Audit reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also meets with the Company’s external auditors separately from management.
The Compensation and DevelopmentCompliance Committee, which is chaired by Mr. Lawton,Dearth, oversees risk assessment and risk mitigation related to matters within the Compliance Committee’s oversight responsibilities, which may include environmental protection, employee health, safety and security, data privacy, employment, anti-bribery and anti-corruption, product quality compliance, and ethics and compliance training.
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee, which is chaired by Ms. Reed, takes the lead role in overseeing the management of risks as they relate to the Company’s compensation policies and practices. During 2017,2023, the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee reviewed these compensation policies and practices and did not identify any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Executive Sessions
The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require Executive Sessions of independent Directors aredirectors to be held at least two timesonce per year. Executive Sessions are generally held by the independent Directors after every regular Board of Directors meeting and after most Board committee meetings. The Executive Sessions after all regular Board of Directors meetings are chaired by the Lead Independent Director. Any independent Directordirector can request that additional Executive Sessions be scheduled. In 2017, four2023, seven Executive Sessions without management were held by the independent Directorsdirectors and chaired by Mr. Wehmer in his capacity as Lead Independent Director. In addition, Executive Sessions without management were also held after many Board committee meetings during 20172023 and were chaired by the respective chairmenchairs of the Board committees.
Communication with the Board
A stockholder may communicate with the Board of Directors by writing c/o Secretary’s Office, Stepan Company, Edens Expressway and Winnetka Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093. Mail addressed to a specific Director or Board committee will be delivered to that Director or Board committee. The Secretary delivers all correspondence without first screening the correspondence.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Company’s CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee in 20172023 were Mr. Boyce,Ms. Burgess, Mr. Dearth, Dr. Delgado, Mr. Lawton (Chairman), Ms. Reed (Chair) and Mr. Wehmer. Gregory E. Lawton also served as a member and Chair of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee until his term as a director ended upon his passing on August 18, 2023. None of the members of the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee during 2017 had2023 were at any time been an officer or employee of the Company nor haddid any member participatedparticipate in a Related Party Transaction. In 2017,2023, none of the Company’s executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, or as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee or as one of the Company’s Directors.directors.
17
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Summary of Executive Compensation in 20172023
In 2017,2023, the Company and the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) applied the compensation policies and principles described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis in determining the compensation for the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table. Those individuals are referred to herein as the named executive officers (“NEOs”). The NEOs for 20172023 were:
| NEO | Title | |
Scott R. Behrens | ||
|
| |
|
| |
| Executive Vice President, Supply Chain | |
David G. Kabbes (2) | Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | |
Sean T. Moriarty | Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants | |
|
| |
Arthur W. Mergner | Former Executive Vice President, |
|
| |
on May 1, 2023. |
| Mr. | from April 3, 2023, through September 17, 2023. |
| Mr. | his retirement on July 3, 2023. |
Significant Achievements and Developments in 20172023
Record Company Performance
(1) | In |
| (2) |
|
|
| (3) |
|
|
Key Developments Impacting Executive Compensation
(1) | The Company’s advisory Say-on-Pay vote was supported by |
1 Adjusted net income is a financial measure that has not been calculated pursuant to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). See Appendix A for further discussion and a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
18
| (2) | Due to the Company’s 2023 financial performance, and regardless of the level of achievement of individual performance goals, the NEOs did not receive any annual incentive awards for 2023. In addition, and also as a result of failing to meet certain financial goals, the performance shares that were granted to the NEOs in February 2023 under the Company’s long-term incentive plan were forfeited. |
| After considering all components of the total compensation paid to the NEOs in |
Executive Compensation Best Practices the Company Follows
What We Do | What We Don’t Do | |||||
| Pay for Performance—a Majority of our NEOs’ Annual Total Compensation is Variable and
| O |
| |||
| Align Executives’ Total Compensation Mix with Stockholders’ Interests | O | No Repricing or Replacing Outstanding Stock Options or Stock Appreciation Rights Without Stockholder Approval | |||
| Require Significant Executive Stock Ownership | O | No Employment Agreements That Guarantee Employment or Compensation | |||
| Limit Performance-Based Incentive Awards to a Maximum of 200% of Target | O | No Standing Individual Severance or Change-in-Control Agreements | |||
| Provide Limited Executive Perquisites | O | No Use of Excise Tax Gross-Ups | |||
| Subject Incentive Compensation to a Clawback Policy | O | No Dividend Payments on Unearned Performance Shares | |||
|
|
Compensation Philosophy
The basic premise of the Company’s executive compensation philosophy is to pay for performance. The Company’s intention is to foster a performance-driven culture with competitive total compensation as a key driver for all employees. Compensation levels commensurate with Company performance are designed to align the interests of our employees with the interests of our stockholders. To better align our NEOs’ compensation with the interests of our stockholders, a substantial portion of compensation is at-risk and performance-based.
The Company’s guiding philosophy in setting executive compensation is that the compensation of executive officers should reflect the scope of their job responsibilities and the level of individual and corporate performance achieved. Executive compensation should be competitive internally and externally with like or comparable positions based on job descriptions and responsibilities at similarly sized companies within the Company’s industries, andindustry, Peer Group (as defined below) and other appropriate related industry data or survey information. The Company’s compensation philosophy is reviewed at least annually by the Committee.
The effectiveness of the executive compensation program is primarily measured by Company performance, stock price, appreciation,external market dynamics, the ability of the Company to attract and retain executive officers, and comparison against other relevant, external benchmarks as needed.
The Committee generally does not consider the impact of previously awarded compensation in determining current executive total compensation. The Committee does, however, use both a chemical
19
industry peer group as well as aggregate executive compensation survey data to annually assess executive compensation as described below under “Compensation Peer Group and Survey Data.” Except for the limits regarding incentive compensation as described below, the Committee does not use specific policies to allocate between cash and non-cash compensation or between short-term and long-term compensation.
Compensation Objectives
The overall objectives of the Company’s compensation programsprogram (in which each NEO participates) are as follows:
motivate employees to achieve and maintain a high level of performance, and drive results that will help the Company achieve its goals;
| • | motivate employees to achieve and maintain a high level of performance, and drive results that will help the Company achieve its goals; |
align the interests of our employees with the interests of our stockholders;
| • | align the interests of our employees with the interests of our stockholders; |
provide for market-competitive levels of compensation; and
| • | provide for market-competitive levels of compensation; and |
attract and retain employees of outstanding ability.
| • | attract and retain employees of outstanding ability. |
Role of the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee
The Committee is responsible for overseeing the establishment and administration of the Company’s policies, programs and procedures for compensating the Company’s executive management, as further described below. The Committee is also responsible for providing advice to the Company regarding executive development and succession planning. The Committee may, in its discretion, delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, to any other body or individual.
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Committee engaged Exequity LLP (“Exequity”) as its independent compensation consultant for 2017.2023. Exequity advises the Committee on a range of executive compensation matters. The scope of Exequity’s services to the Committee includes, but is not limited to, the following:
Providing the Committee with an assessment of the market competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation.
Apprising the Committee of executive compensation-related trends and developments in the marketplace.
Informing the Committee of regulatory developments relating to executive compensation practices.
Assisting the Committee with goal-setting,goal setting, calibrating levels of pay to various levels of performance, and pay for performance alignment.
Comparing Company executive compensation plan designs and practices to the marketplace.
Recommending changes to the executive compensation program to maintain competitiveness and ensure consistency with business strategies, good governance practices and alignment with stockholder interests.
20
Exequity reports directly to the Committee. The Committee assessedconducted its annual assessment of Exequity’s independence pursuant to SEC rules and determined that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Exequity from independently advising the Committee. Exequity does not provide any other services to management or the Company.
Role of the Committee and Executives in Establishing Executive Compensation
The Committee determines the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President –and Chief Human Resources Officer make recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation for all other executive officers, including the NEOs, other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.with respect to their own compensation. The Committee then reviews these recommendations and approves the final compensation for all executive officers. All recommendations made to the Committee and all determinations made by the Committee are based upon the Company’s policies and guidelines and other relevant factors outlined in the “Compensation Peer Group and Survey Data” and “Elements of Compensation” sections below.
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
The advisory vote in 20172023 was the sevenththirteenth consecutive year that the Company’s Say-on-Pay vote was supported by its stockholders with the approval of more than 96% of the votes cast at the annual meeting of stockholders. As stated above, the Company’s advisory Say-on-Pay vote was supported by 98% of votes cast at the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting. The Committee acknowledges and values the feedback from the Company’s stockholders on the annual Say-on-Pay vote and believes that these results demonstrate stockholder support of the Company’s executive compensation programs. As a result of the strong stockholder support for the 2017 2023 Say-on-Pay vote, the Committee determined that the Company’s compensation practices and processes did not require any significant modifications to achieve the desired results of the Company’s compensation program or to address stockholder concerns.concerns and therefore did not make any changes as a direct result of such vote results. The Committee will continue to consider the outcome of these advisory votes when determining future executive compensation arrangements.
21
Executive Pay Mix
The Company targets a total compensation mix where fixed pay, consisting of base salary, is less than half of the total compensation that any NEO or executive officer may earn in any given year. The combined mix of both short-term and long-term incentives for executive officer compensation is structured to encourage the necessary focus and motivation to achieve outstanding results on an ongoing basis, both in the short term and long term. In addition, the combined focus on both short-term and long-term objectives alignsis designed to align executive officers’ and stockholders’ interests. Short-term incentives for executive officers are based on individual and Company performance. Long-term incentives for executive officers are based only on Company performance.performance (performance shares) or are time-vested (RSUs and SARs). The Company’s total compensation targets assume above-average Company performance, and potential compensation can vary considerably depending on overall Company performance. The graphics below illustrate the pay mix for our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other NEOs other than Mr. Mergner, who retired on July 3, 2023, (on an average basis) using target level of performance for all incentive awards.
|
|
Compensation Peer Group and Survey Data
To better understand the compensation practices of similar companies, the Committee reviews data gathered from a custom peer group (“Peer Group”) and general market survey data from Mercer LLC (“Mercer”). Information gathered from the Peer Group serves as the primary reference point for the Committee, with Mercer survey data used as a secondary reference.
The Peer Group consists of companies selected on the basis of chemical industry affiliation and size as compared to the Company (e.g., total revenues and market capitalization). The following companies comprised the Peer Group that the Committee referenced when setting 20172023 compensation:
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
| H.B. Fuller Company |
| Quaker Chemical Corporation | |
Avient Corporation | Innospec Inc. | RPM International Inc. | ||
Cabot Corporation |
|
| Sensient Technologies Corporation |
The Committee undertakes annual evaluations of the Peer Group in order to ensure the Company is comparing itself with companies that have the characteristics to appropriately match the Company. Exequity performed a review of the Company’s Peer Group listed above in July 20172023 and the Committee did not make changes to the Peer Group as a result of such review, the Committee removed Axiall Corporation, which was acquired in 2016, from the Company’s Peer Group.review. The Committee and Exequityits independent compensation consultant will continue to monitor the Peer Group going forward as appropriate.
22
When assessing the competitiveness of Company compensation programs, the Committee, generally reviewsin part, uses median compensation levels in the Peer Group.Group as a reference point to provide a framework for and on which to base individual compensation decisions. The Committee generally references median total compensation for executive officers, (plus or minus 15% of the 50th percentile), but the Committee retains discretion to determine appropriate compensation levels and the Company does not benchmark compensation.levels. The Committee believes that all NEOs’ and executive officers’ total compensation amounts are within appropriate and reasonable levels as compared to the Peer Group data considering performance, experience level, time in position global job grades and both external and internal equity evaluations.
Elements of Compensation
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017,2023, the principal elements of compensation for the executive officers, including the NEOs, were as follows:
Compensation Element | ||
|
| |
| Description | |
| Base Salary | ||
| To attract and retain employees of outstanding abilities | Fixed component of pay based on specific position salary ranges determined by job responsibilities and performance, time in position at the Company and reference to Peer Group data | |
| Short-Term Incentive Compensation | ||
To drive | Variable, annual, | |
| Long-Term Incentive Compensation | ||
To promote retention of executives, to reward outstanding Company performance, to encourage a focus on the Company’s long-term financial results, and to align executive interests with stockholder interests | Variable, | |
| ||
Retirement Benefits, Perquisites and Other Benefits | ||
| To promote retention, | Company | |
| ||
| Executives and key employees, including the NEOs, are eligible for a limited amount of perquisites | |
| ||
| Benefit programs that are available to all U.S. salaried employees | |
23
Base Salary
The Company has established salary grades and ranges for all global employees, including the NEOs. Salary grades reflect the responsibility level of the position i.e.(i.e., positions with a greater level of responsibility have a higher salary grade.grade). The salary range for each grade is primarily based on survey data. The salary grade structure enables the Company to ensure that pay among executives is both market competitive and internally equitable.
The Committee, taking into consideration the performance of the Company, the Company’s compensation philosophy, the Peer Group data, and the Company’s salary grades,executive’s performance, reviews and determines the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s salary on an annual basis. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President –and Chief Human Resources Officer make recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation for all other NEOs. The Committee has the discretion to approve such recommendations or revise the recommended amounts, higher or lower, based upon each executive officer’s individual performance. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s salary range is determined based on the same factors and criteria as those for the other NEOs and executive officers and all salaried employees.officers.
For 2018, the Committee made the following changes to theThe NEOs’ base salaries, effective as of March 1, 2018:2023 (unless otherwise noted), are shown below. The NEOs’ base salaries were increased slightly to bring them more in line with the market.
NEO |
| 2017 Base Salary |
| 2018 Base Salary |
| Change |
| Rationale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| $900,000 |
| $930,000 |
| +3.33% |
| Merit |
Scott D. Beamer, Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| $380,000 |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
Scott R. Behrens, Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants |
| $375,000 |
| $400,000 |
| +6.67% |
| Merit |
Jennifer Ansbro Hale, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary |
| $342,000 |
| $355,000 |
| +3.80% |
| Merit |
Arthur W. Mergner, Vice President – Supply Chain |
| $380,000 |
| $400,000 |
| +5.26% |
| Merit |
Scott C. Mason, Former Vice President – Supply Chain |
| $380,000 |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
| NEO | 2022 Base Salary | 2023 Base Salary | ||||||
Scott R. Behrens | $ | 900,000 | $ | 940,000 | ||||
Luis E. Rojo | $ | 515,000 | $ | 546,000 | ||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. (1) | N/A | $ | 460,000 | |||||
David G. Kabbes | $ | 445,000 | $ | 464,000 | ||||
Sean T. Moriarty | $ | 440,000 | $ | 462,000 | ||||
Arthur W. Mergner | $ | 480,000 | $ | 490,000 | ||||
| (1) | Mr. Haire joined the Company on May 1, 2023. |
Short-Term Incentive Compensation
NEOs and certain other employees are eligible for short-term incentive compensation as set forth in the Management Incentive Plan. The purpose of the Company’s short-term incentive compensation program is to promote improvedimprovement in year-over-year financial performance; to motivate, attract and retain executive, managerial and key employees of outstanding ability; and to align participants’ interests directly with Companythe Company’s financial targets. The target amount of short-term incentive compensation for each NEO is expressed as a percentage of the executive’s actual base salary earned eachduring the respective calendar year. Because senior managers have a greater ability to impact Company results, a significant percentage of their total target compensation is at-risk.
The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer position has the highest level of responsibility, and therefore, histhe target and maximum annual incentive percentages exceedpercentage exceeds the other NEOs’ target and maximum annual incentive percentages.
The following chart reflects the Target Annual Incentive Award, Maximum Annual Incentive Award, and Annual Incentive Award Earned for each NEO for 2017 under the terms of the Management Incentive Plan:
NEO |
| Target Annual Incentive Award (% of Base Salary) |
| Maximum Annual Incentive Award (% of Base Salary) |
| Annual Incentive Award Earned (% of Base Salary) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| 100% |
| 200% |
| 70.54% |
Scott D. Beamer, Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| 60% |
| 120% |
| 44.94% |
Scott R. Behrens, Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants |
| 60% |
| 120% |
| 50.38% |
Jennifer Ansbro Hale, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary |
| 60% |
| 120% |
| 41.76% |
Arthur W. Mergner, Vice President – Supply Chain |
| 60% |
| 120% |
| 25.63% |
Scott C. Mason, Former Vice President – Supply Chain(1) |
| 60% |
| 120% |
| 41.66% |
|
|
Within the Target Annual Incentive Award ranges shown above, each NEO’s annual incentive payment is determined based on the Company’s overall financial performance (“Corporate Financial Performance Objectives”) and, for NEOs other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the achievement of individual performance objectives (“Individual Performance Objectives”), as described below.
The extent, if any, to which an incentive award will be payable to an NEO will be based solely upon the degree of achievement of pre-established performance goals over the specified calendar year. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, reduce
or eliminate the amount which would otherwise be payable to the NEO with respect to a calendar year. In addition, annual incentive payments as a whole may be reduced, prorated, or eliminated entirely if the Company’s Corporate Net Income falls below certain pre-determined levels.2Similarly, in years when Company performance is exceptional and above the Target level, it is possible for NEOs to receive annual incentive payments above Target, while in years when Company or individual performance is below the Threshold level for a particular metric, no annual incentive will be paid based upon Company performance.performance on that metric. In addition, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, reduce or eliminate the amount that would otherwise be payable to the NEO with respect to a calendar year.
All executive officers and other key Company executives have a Maximum level of achievement above
24
The following chart reflects the Target level, which rewards exceptionalAnnual Incentive Award and Maximum Annual Incentive Award for each NEO for 2023 under the terms of the Management Incentive Plan (which target amounts were the same as for 2022 for each NEO who was employed by the Company performance. Anyin 2022):
| NEO | Target Annual Incentive Award (% of 2023 Salary Earned) | Maximum Annual Incentive Award (% of 2023 Salary Earned) | ||
Scott R. Behrens, | 100.0% | 200.0% | ||
Luis E. Rojo | 75.0% | 150.0% | ||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | 75.0% | 150.0% | ||
David G. Kabbes | 65.0% | 130.0% | ||
Sean T. Moriarty | 75.0% | 150.0% | ||
Arthur W. Mergner | 75.0% | 150.0% |
Each NEO’s annual incentive earned in excesspayment is determined based on the Company’s achievement of overall financial performance objectives (“Corporate Financial Performance Objectives”) and the executive’s target annual incentive isachievement of individual performance objectives (“Individual Performance Objectives”), as described below. For 2023, each NEO’s Annual Incentive Award could be increased by a prorated between the Target and Maximum levels for theamount if Corporate Net Income goal only. The maximum payout can only occur whenexceeded the CompanyTarget objective, with a two times multiplier applied if Corporate Net Income maximum objective is achievedmet or exceeded.exceeded the Maximum objective. Similarly, each NEO’s Annual Incentive Award could be reduced if Corporate Net Income did not meet the Threshold objective.
Corporate Financial Performance Objectives
The Committee establishes the Corporate Financial Performance Objectives at the beginning of each calendar year. For 2017,2023, the Committee established targets for the two Corporate Financial Performance Objectives for all NEOs: Corporate Net Income and Corporate Growth Goal.2
For 2017,2023, the following performance levels were established for the Corporate Net Income objective:
| Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||
Corporate Net Income | $ | $ | $ |
The Corporate Growth Goal consisted of specified sales volume growthprofit goals for fourthree categories of products and customers. Each ofTogether, the fourthree categories of products and customers had an assigned sales volume growthprofit goal, with a target increasesincrease over 2016 sales.2022 profit. The growth goals wereCorporate Growth Goal was based upon strategic growth priorities for the Company and werewas designed to be difficult but achievable. The Corporate Growth goals were established forGoal consisted of profit growth in the following categories: Rigid Polyols, CASE Polyols, Functional Surfactants and Tier 2 and Tier 3 SurfactantsSurfactant Customers.
For 2017,2023, the following payoutperformance levels were established for the Corporate Growth Goal:Goal with reference to the profit achieved:
|
|
| ||||||
| Threshold | Target | |||||||
Corporate Growth Goal |
|
|
|
|
|
Each NEO’s annual incentive objectives include these Corporate Financial Performance Objectives. For 2017,2023, all NEOs had at least 35% of their annual incentives tied to these objectives. Within the allocation assigned to each of these performance objectives for NEOs was an 80% weighting for Corporate Net Income and a 20% weighting for the Corporate Growth Goal. Given his level of responsibility, the annual incentive for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was based entirely on these Corporate Financial Performance Objectives, subjecta weighting of approximately 85% was assigned to the Corporate Net Income objective and a reduction if certain corporate safety objectives (the “Corporate Safety Objectives”) were not achieved. All other NEOs each had at least 40%weighting of their annual incentive tiedapproximately 15% was assigned to these same objectives.the Corporate Growth Goal objective.
2 Corporate Net Income is a non-GAAP measure that differs from the Company’s reported net income. See Appendix A for a definition.
25
The following table shows the Company’s performance against the Corporate Net Income and Corporate Growth Goal objectives in 2017:2023:
| Objective | 2023 Results | 2023 Threshold | Annual Incentive Award |
|
|
| |||||
Earned) | |||||||||||
Corporate Net Income | $ | $ |
| ||||||||
Corporate Growth Goal |
|
|
|
For 2017,2023, the Company did not achievemeet the Corporate Net Income TargetThreshold objective of $113.0$130.0 million, with a result of $108.9 million. While the Corporate Net Income objective was$50.7 million, and did not achieved at Target, the Company had record net income for 2017. The Company believes that to be a significant achievement which benefits all stockholders.
For 2017, the Company achieved 88.2% of the Corporate Net Income target level and one of the four components ofmeet the Corporate Growth Goal. Prior to the startGoal Threshold objective of 2017, the Committee approved the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s recommendation that his 2017 annual incentive award would be reduced by up to 10% if$667.0 million, with a result of $593.9 million. Because the Company did not achieve itsmeet the Threshold Corporate Safety Objectives. Financial Performance Objectives, the NEOs did not earn any portion of their Annual Incentive Awards for 2023.
Individual Performance Objectives
The Company achieved 50% of Corporate Safety Objectives in 2017. As a result, the ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer’s 2017 annual incentive award was reduced by 5%.
|
|
Officer and the Committee agreed upon the Individual Performance Objectives for the President and Chief Executive Officer at the beginning of 2023. For executives other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the executive agree upon Individual Performance Objectives at the beginning of each calendar year. These Individual Performance Objectives may either be financial objectives for a particular business segment or organization,function, or achievement of certain financial, safety, service or other strategic objectives specific to their function and responsibility. For 2023, the Chief Executive Officer’s Individual Performance Objectives included enhancing long-term Company performance by championing core culture and values, including safety, compliance, and employee engagement and accountability, as well as specific operational objectives in areas such as supply chain and capital project execution. For each business segment leader, the financial performance of the executive’s segment comprises a significant portion of the executive’s Individual Performance Objectives. For example, for 2017,2023, global surfactant operating income comprised 40%30% of the short-term incentive compensation objectives for Mr. Behrens,Moriarty, the Company’s Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants, and global polymer operating income comprised 40%Surfactants.
As stated above, as a result of the short-term incentive compensation objectives for Mr. Mergner, who served as the Company’s Vice President2023 financial performance, and General Manager – Polymers until he transitioned to the rolenotwithstanding achievement of Vice President – Supply Chain in August 2017.
For 2017, the Corporate Financial Performance Objectives andany Individual Performance Objectives, weightings and results for the NEOs other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were as follows:
| Corporate Financial Performance Objectives |
| DRIVE Initiatives(1) |
| Safety Objectives(2) |
| Individual Objectives(3) | ||||||||
NEO | Weight |
| Payout |
| Weight |
| Payout |
| Weight |
| Payout |
| Weight |
| Payout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott D. Beamer, Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 60.0% |
| 45.3% |
| 10.0% |
| 10.0% |
| 5.0% |
| 2.5% |
| 25.0% |
| 17.1% |
Scott R. Behrens, Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants | 40.0% |
| 30.2% |
| 5.0% |
| 5.0% |
| 5.0% |
| 2.5% |
| 50.0% |
| 43.8% |
Jennifer Ansbro Hale, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary | 50.0% |
| 37.8% |
| 5.0% |
| 5.0% |
| 10.0% |
| 5.0% |
| 35.0% |
| 21.8% |
Arthur W. Mergner, Vice President – Supply Chain | 40.0% |
| 30.2% |
| — |
| — |
| 5.0% |
| 5.0% |
| 55.0% |
| 7.5% |
Scott C. Mason, Former Vice President – Supply Chain | 50.0% |
| 37.8% |
| 10.0% |
| 10.0% |
| 10.0% |
| 5.0% |
| 30.0% |
| 16.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts earned by the NEOs under the Company’s short-term compensation programdid not earn any annual incentive awards for 2017 are set forth in the Non‑Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.2023.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
The Committee typically grants stock options, SARs and performance sharesequity awards annually to the NEOs under the Company’s long-term incentive plan. In 2017,2023, the Committee reviewed and approved an allocation of long-term incentives for the NEOs other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at approximately 15%25% of the total grant amountvalue as stock options, 45%SARs, approximately 25% of the total grant amountvalue as SARs,RSUs and 40%approximately 50% of the total grant amount as performance shares. The long-term incentive components for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were allocated at approximately 30% of the total grant amount as stock options, 30% of the total grant amount as SARs, and 40% of the total grant amountvalue as performance shares. The Committee approved this allocation forchanged the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer dueequity award mix to the fact that the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has the highest level of responsibility for the Company’s direction and performance.add RSUs in 2023 in order to better align with market practice.
NEO |
| Stock Option Value |
| Stock Appreciation Rights Value |
| Performance Shares Value |
| Total 2017 LTI Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| $570,000 |
| $570,000 |
| $760,000 |
| $1,900,000 |
Scott D. Beamer, Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| $67,500 |
| $202,500 |
| $180,000 |
| $450,000 |
Scott R. Behrens, Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants |
| $75,000 |
| $225,000 |
| $200,000 |
| $500,000 |
Jennifer Ansbro Hale, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary |
| $33,000 |
| $99,000 |
| $88,000 |
| $220,000 |
Arthur W. Mergner, Vice President – Supply Chain |
| $75,000 |
| $225,000 |
| $200,000 |
| $500,000 |
Scott C. Mason, Former Vice President – Supply Chain |
| $67,500 |
| $202,500 |
| $180,000 |
| $450,000 |
| NEO | Stock Appreciation Rights Value | Restricted Stock Units Value | Performance Shares Value | Total 2023 LTI Value | ||||||||||||
Scott R. Behrens | $ 780,000 | $ 780,000 | $ 1,560,000 | $ 3,120,000 | ||||||||||||
Luis E. Rojo | $ 225,000 | $ 225,000 | $ 450,000 | $ 900,000 | ||||||||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | $ 150,000 | $ 150,000 | $ 300,000 | $ 600,000 | ||||||||||||
David G. Kabbes | $ 150,000 | $ 150,000 | $ 300,000 | $ 600,000 | ||||||||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | $ 150,000 | $ 150,000 | $ 300,000 | $ 600,000 | ||||||||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | $ 168,750 | $ 168,750 | $ 337,500 | $ 675,000 | ||||||||||||
26
The chart below shows the number of each type of equity award that the Committee granted to the NEOs as part of the annual 20172023 equity grant:grant. The number of SARs granted was calculated by dividing the amounts in the table above by the Black-Scholes value of a SAR on the date of the grant. The number of RSUs and performance shares granted was calculated by dividing the amounts in the table above by the average of the opening price and closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.
NEO |
| Stock Options |
| Stock Appreciation Rights |
| Performance Shares (at Target) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| 24,051 |
| 24,051 |
| 9,672 |
Scott D. Beamer, Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| 2,848 |
| 8,544 |
| 2,291 |
Scott R. Behrens, Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants |
| 3,165 |
| 9,494 |
| 2,545 |
Jennifer Ansbro Hale, Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary |
| 1,393 |
| 4,178 |
| 1,120 |
Arthur W. Mergner, Vice President – Supply Chain |
| 3,165 |
| 9,494 |
| 2,545 |
Scott C. Mason, Former Vice President – Supply Chain |
| 2,848 |
| 8,544 |
| 2,291 |
| NEO | Stock Appreciation Rights | Restricted Stock Units | Performance Shares (at Target) | |||||||||
Scott R. Behrens | 19,742 | 7,096 | 14,192 | |||||||||
Luis E. Rojo | 5,695 | 2,047 | 4,094 | |||||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | 4,744 | 1,649 | 3,299 | |||||||||
David G. Kabbes | 3,797 | 1,365 | 2,729 | |||||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | 3,797 | 1,365 | 2,729 | |||||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | 4,271 | 1,535 | 3,070 | |||||||||
The grants of stock options, SARs, RSUs and performance share awards to the NEOs are shown in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The Board of Directors believes that the mix of such awards provideprovides long-term incentive compensation that is market competitive to attract and retain executives who drive the long-term growth of the Company and further align the interests of those executives with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.
In addition to the annual long-term incentive awards, grants of stock options, SARs, RSUs, performance shares and other stock awards may be awarded to executive officers at other times based on factors that the Committee determines to be relevant, including upon hire, upon promotion or for extraordinary job performance.
Stock Options
Stock options are granted annually with an exercise price equal In recognition of his service as Interim Chief Human Resources Officer during 2023, Mr. Kabbes was awarded, in addition to the fair marketgrants set forth above, a grant of 762 RSUs with a value of the Common Stock on the date of grant and have a ten-year term. Options granted prior to 2017 vest two years after the date of the grant; beginning with the 2017 awards, options vest ratably over a three-year period. Backdating of stock options is prohibited under all circumstances.$50,000 in October 2023.
Stock Appreciation Rights
SARs are granted annually at the fair market valueaverage of the opening price and closing price of Common Stock on the date of the grant and have a ten-year term. SARs granted prior to 2017 vest two years after the date of the grant; beginning with the 2017 grants, SARs vest ratably over a three year period. SARsthree-year period and are settled in stock.
Restricted Stock Awards (Performance Shares)Units
RSUs are granted annually at the average of the opening price and closing price of Common Stock on the date of the grant. RSUs vest ratably over a three-year period and are settled in stock.
Performance Shares
Performance shares are earned primarily based upon achievementcontingently awarded at a target number of shares and subject to certain performance conditions established by the Committee. The Committee chose Corporate Net Income as a performance measure because the Company uses net income as an important indicator of business performance. The Company uses an adjusted measure, rather than reported net income, because the adjusted measure excludes items that may not be indicative of the Company’s core operating results. The initial target number of shares may increase or decrease by up to 50% based on the Company’s Corporate Net Income results for the calendar year in which the grant is made versus Threshold, Target and Maximum objectives for the calendar year during which the grant is made. A maximum of 150% of the award can be earned if Corporate Net Income objectives. If the Company’s Corporate Net Income result for such year is below the Threshold objective, then the performance shares are forfeited entirely. If the Company’s Corporate Net Income result for such year exceeds the Maximum objective. Shares are distributed followingobjective, then the target number of shares will be increased by 50%. Following completion of athe three-year
27
performance period, after being measured againstthe number of shares may further increase or decrease by up to 30%, based on a three-year average Corporate Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) modifier that could increase or decrease the number of shares earned by up to 30%.modifier.3 For the performance shares granted in 2017,2023, the CompanyCommittee set the following Corporate Net Income objectives:
Performance Level | 2023 Corporate Net Income | Initial Share Award (% of Target) | ||||
Threshold | $ | 130 million | 50% | |||
Target | $ | 145 million | 100% | |||
Maximum | $ | 160 million | 150% | |||
The Committee set the following ROIC modifiers for the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2025:
2023-2025 Average ROIC | Award Modifier | |
Less than or equal to 6.75% | -30% | |
7.50% | No impact | |
Equal to or greater than 8.25% | +30% |
The 2023 Corporate Net Income result of $50.7 million was below the Threshold objective level. Therefore, the performance shares granted in 2023 were forfeited and no shares will determinebe earned or issued in respect thereof.
For the performance shares granted in 2021, the initial calculation of the number of performance shares that may vest after the performance period ending December 31, 2019was based on the following Corporate Net Income objectives:
Performance Level |
Net Income | Initial Share Award (% of Target) | ||||
Threshold | $ | 116 million | 50% | |||
Target | $ | 145 million | 100% | |||
Maximum | $ | 159 million | 150% | |||
|
|
The Company will determineCommittee determined the actual number of performance shares that actually vestissued after the three-year performance period ending December 31, 20192023, based on the following ROIC modifiers:
2017-2019 Average ROIC |
| Award Modifier |
|
|
|
10% |
| -30% |
10.75% |
| No impact |
11.5% |
| +30% |
2021-2023 Average ROIC | Award Modifier | |
Less than or equal to 9.75% | -30% | |
10.75% | No impact | |
Equal to or greater than 11.75% | +30% |
3 Return on Invested Capital is a non-GAAP measure. See Appendix A for a definition.
28
The 2017 result of $108.9 million in2021 Corporate Net Income result was above$143.5 million and the Target level.2021-2023 average ROIC result was 8.08%. Therefore, the number of shares ultimately earned and issued for the 20172021 grant will be 88.2% of Target plus or minus a modifying factorperformance shares was 68.18% of up to 30% based on the average ROIC calculated overinitial target number of shares. The following chart reflects the three-year period ending December 31, 2019.number and value of shares earned and issued in respect of the performance shares granted in 2021.
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) (2) | ||||||
Scott R. Behrens | 2,205 | $ | 202,606 | |||||
Luis E. Rojo | 1,488 | $ | 136,725 | |||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. (1) | — | — | ||||||
David G. Kabbes | 1,102 | $ | 101,257 | |||||
Sean T. Moriarty | 1,323 | $ | 121,564 | |||||
Arthur W. Mergner | 1,226 | $ | 112,651 | |||||
| (1) | Mr. Haire joined the Company on May 1, 2023. |
| (2) | The value is based on the market value of the Company’s Common Stock of $91.89 per share, the average of the high and low prices on February 15, 2024, the date of vesting. |
Retirement Benefits
Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees
Effective June 30, 2006, the Company froze the Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees”) and ended the benefit accrual for all participants. Eligible participants were all employees not covered by a collective bargaining agreement who were employees prior to July 1, 2006. The Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees was replaced by the Savings and Investment Retirement Plan (“SIRP”), which provides for Company contributions into the employee’s SIRP account (see the discussion below in the “Savings and Investment Retirement Plan” section). The primary purpose of both the Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees and the SIRP is to retain valuable employees.
The amounts included in the Pension Benefits table are the present values of the benefits expected to be paid under the Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees in the future. The amount of each future payment is based on the current accrued pension benefit. The actuarial assumptions, with the exception of the expected retirement age, are consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements. The retirement age is the earliest unreduced retirement age as defined in the Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees and the SIRP.SIRP.
The pension benefit information set forth in this proxy statement has been calculated based on actuarial assumptions that are considered to be reasonable. Other actuarial assumptions could also be considered to be reasonable, which would result in different pension benefit estimates.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
NEOs participate in the same basic retirement plans as all other employees, with the exception of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who is also currently eligible for benefits under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). The SERP was created to provide supplemental retirement benefits to any executive affected by IRS limits on benefits that otherwise would be available through the Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees. The benefits are calculated according to the same retirement plan formula that applies to all eligible employees. The SERP is offered to retain and motivate the covered NEOs. The Company believes that all elements of the SERP are customary for this type of retirement plan. The SERP was frozen as of June 30, 2006. The funding status of the SERP is reviewed periodically. Currently, the Company has elected not to fund the SERP.
Savings and Investment Retirement Plan
Pursuant to the SIRP, in each payroll period during 2017,2023, the Company made a contribution to the SIRP account of each eligible employee, including the NEOs. The amount of the Company contribution in 20172023 was four percent of the participant’s base salary for the portion of the payroll period during which the participant was an eligible employee. This percentage was the same for all employees, including the NEOs. All of the NEOs received SIRP contributions in 2017 in the amounts set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Beginning January 1, 2018, the Company changed its contribution to the SIRP to a dollar-for-dollar matching contribution of up to six percent of the participant’s base salary for the portion of the payroll period during which the participant was an eligible employee.employee (subject to certain limits). All the NEOs received SIRP contributions in 2023 in the amounts set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
29
Profit Sharing PlanProfit-Sharing Contributions
The Company may make two types of additional profit-sharing contributions (Basic Company Contribution and Supplemental Company Contribution) under the Profit Sharing Plan, which is a component of the SIRP to the SIRP account of each eligible employee, including the NEOs.NEOs and salaried, hourly and union employees. The Company’s Profit Sharing Plan isprofit-sharing contributions are designed to (i) provide eligible employees with an element of their retirement savings that is directly connected to the Company’s financial results, (ii) provide a tax deferredtax-deferred retirement savings vehicle for eligible employees while giving all participants the incentive to optimize the Company’s financial results, and (iii) allow eligible employees to enjoy the benefits of the Company’s success.
For the Basic Company Contribution, eachEach year management determines, based on the Company’s financial results, whether to recommend to the Committee that the Company make a Basic Company Contributionprofit-sharing contribution to the accounts of eligible participants in the Profit Sharing Plan.participants. The Committee reviews management’s recommendation and, if approved, presents the recommendation to the Board of Directors for approval. TheIn 2023, the Committee typically recommendsrecommended a Basic Company Contributionprofit-sharing contribution that iswas based on four and one‑half percent2.5% of the Company’s 2022 pre-tax income. In addition to income, which was approved by the Basic Company Contribution, the Board of Directors may make a Supplemental Company Contribution to the Profit Sharing Plan in an additional amount at its discretion.Board.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Stepan Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan II (“ESOP II”), which is applicable to NEOs, is designed to (i) expand stock ownership among employees, (ii) encourage greater employee interest in the Company’s financial results, (iii) benefit employees financially by enabling them to acquire shares of the Company’s Common Stock without making contributions, and (iv) provide eligible employees with the opportunity to share in the growth of the Company.
Contributions to ESOP II are a part of the Basic Company Contribution inprofit-sharing contribution under the SIRP as described in the “Savings and Investment Retirement Plan”“Profit-Sharing Contributions” section above and are thenmay be reallocated to ESOP II in shares of Company Common Stock. For example, the Committee may approve a Basic Company Contribution based upon the formula noted above, and then determine that 50% of the total contribution will remain in the SIRP and 50% will be reallocated to ESOP II. The ESOP II allocation is made to broaden Company stock ownership among employees for further alignment with the interests of Company stockholders.
SERP Profit Sharing Plan
In addition For 2023, the Committee approved a 100% allocation to ESOP II for eligible U.S. employees, including the Basic Company ContributionNEOs.
Supplemental Executive Savings and the Supplemental Company Contribution, theInvestment Retirement Contributions
The Board of Directors has the authority to approve supplemental benefits pursuantcontributions to the Profit Sharing Plan for certain executives (“SERP Profit Sharing Plan”). The SERP Profit Sharing Plan benefits are provided to executives as a common executive benefit which allows the Company to be competitive for executive compensation and benefits. The SERP Profit Sharing Plan was created to provide supplemental retirement benefits to any executive affected by IRS limits on benefits that otherwise would be available through contributions to the Profit Sharing Plan.SIRP. The SERP Profit Sharing Plan is funded bysupplemental contributions are provided to executives as a common executive benefit that allows the Company.Company to be competitive for executive compensation and benefits. During 2017,2023, all of the NEOs were eligible to receive Companysupplemental contributions to the SERP Profit Sharing Plan in the amount by which a four percent contribution to the NEO’s SIRP account by the Company would exceed IRS limits. All SERP Profit Sharing Plan contributions to the NEOs in 2017 are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Beginning January 1, 2018, all of the NEOs will be eligible to receive Company contributions to the SERP Profit Sharing Plan in the amount by which a six percent contribution to the NEO’s SIRP account by the Company would exceed IRS limits. All supplemental contributions to the NEOs in 2023 are included in the Summary Compensation Table.
Perquisites
The Company provides NEOs with limited perquisites that the Company and the Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with the Company’s overall compensation program because they better enable the Company to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites provided to the NEOs and other executives. For 2017, these perquisites represented a small percentage of each NEO’s total compensation, ranging from 0.51%
The Company offers additional long-term disability “top-up” coverage to 1.06%, with a median of 0.85%. The dollar values of perquisites providedemployees, including NEOs, whose long-term disability coverage is limited due to each NEO ranged from $5,446payout caps under the long-term disability coverage offered to $26,730, with a median of $8,847.all U.S. salaried employees.
30
All executives at the Vice President level and higher, including the NEOs, are provided the use of Company-leased vehicles, including fuel, maintenance and insurance. The allowance for the initial vehicle cost is set by salary grade. The personal use value is computed using the IRS annual lease valuation rule. Other travel benefits, including spousal travel on a limited basis, are provided periodically. The Company also provides relocation benefits for newly hired executive officers.
The Company maintains twomaintained one Company-owned properties which arecondominium that is not used solely for business purposes. Executives, including the NEOs, are allowed to use these propertiesthis property for personal use if and when the properties areproperty is not needed for business purposes. When these properties are used by the NEOs use this property for personal reasons, such values are included in the Summary Compensation Table under “All Other Compensation” based on the incremental cost to the Company.
The Company purchases tickets for a variety of entertainment events. These tickets are used primarily for business purposes. However, at various times, these tickets are used by executives for personal use. Where these tickets are used for personal purposes, the actual cost to the Company for the tickets is reported in the Summary Compensation Table under “All Other Compensation.” In addition, the Company pays club membership dues and an annual credit card fee for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer which are not exclusively used for business entertainment. The actual cost paid for club membership dues is included in the Summary Compensation Table under “All Other Compensation.”
Clawback Policy
In February 2018, theThe Company has adopted a Clawback Policy that applies to the Company’s executive officers who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The current version of the policy applies to compensation received on or after October 2, 2023, and is intended to comply with applicable SEC and New York Stock Exchange requirements. Under this policy, in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial statements, the Company will recover from all covered executives, regardless of fault and without regard to any taxes paid, compensation that would not have been paid had the restated financial statements initially been correct. The compensation that could be recovered includes short-term and long-term incentive compensation awarded based on the subsequently restated financial statements that was paid during the three completed fiscal years preceding the restatement. The previous version of the policy applies to compensation received prior to October 2, 2023. Under that version of the policy, in the event that any executive covered by the policy engages in willful misconduct or fraud that substantially contributes to a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements, the Company will
recover from all covered executives compensation that would not have been paid had the restated financial statements initially been correct. The compensation that could be recovered includes short-term and long-term incentive compensation awarded based on the subsequently restated financial statements that was paid during the 12 months preceding the restatement.
Stock Ownership Policy
The Company maintainsNEOs are subject to a stock ownership policy for key executives.policy. The Company instituted a stock ownership policy because it believes that ownership of Company stock by key executives is desirable in order to focus both short-term and long-term decision-making on the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Key executives’ ownershipOwnership of Company stock aligns those executives’NEOs’ interests with the Company’s financial performance, including the performance of the Company’s Common Stock.
The stock ownership policy, last amended in December 2022, is reviewed by the Committee, as needed, on a periodic basis against peer group and general industry benchmarks of stock ownership.
The stock ownership guidelines apply to all NEOs and certain other key Company executives who participate in the Management Incentive Plan.employees. The Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is required to maintain ownership of shares with a value of at least five times his base salary; each other executive officer is required to maintain ownership of shares with a value of at least two and a half times his or her base salary; and each other participant is required to maintain ownership of shares with a value of at least one timetimes his or her base salary. All executives, including the NEOs, haveare expected to reach and maintain the required stock ownership level within five years from their initial stock grantgrant. In the event of a promotion that would require an increase in stock ownership under the terms of the policy, an executive has five years from the date of the promotion to achieve compliance with thesethe new level of stock ownership requirements. AllDuring the first thirty-six months of eligibility, all executives, including the NEOs, must meet their respectiveare encouraged, but not required, to progress toward compliance by making
31
approximately twenty percent progress each year. After thirty-six months of eligibility, all executives, including the NEOs, are required to demonstrate progress toward the stock ownership requirement by making approximately 20% progress eachattaining eighty percent of the required level by year for five years.four and one hundred percent of the required level by year five. Recognizing the importance of retirement planning, an NEO may, commencing at age 61, reduce his or her holdings by 20%ten percent per year up to a minimumfifty percent of one times his or her annual base salaryrequired ownership level by the calendar year he or she attains the age of 65.
The following shares count towards the stock ownership requirements: (i) shares owned directly or by any immediate family member, (ii) shares owned indirectly as trustee or custodian for the benefit of children, (iii)indirectly(ii) shares owned in the Company’s ESOP II, (iv)(iii) shares owned in the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and (v)(iv) shares held in any Company deferred compensation plan. Unvestedplan, (v) time-based restricted stock award grants may also count towards the stock ownership requirement. Grants of stockawards and (vi) unvested performance shares no longer subject to performance conditions. Stock options SARs and performance sharesSARs do not count towards the stock ownership requirement unless actually exercised or earned.requirement. No shares other than those stated above count towardstoward the stock ownership requirements.
The stock ownership policy is reviewed by the Committee, as needed, on a periodic basis against general industry benchmarks of stock ownership.
The Committee reviews annually whether executives, including the NEOs, are in compliance with the stock ownership policy. The Committee determined that all executive officers, including the NEOs, were in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership requirements as of February 2018.March 2024. Executive officers who received their initial stock grant over five years ago are in full compliance and executive officers who received their initial stock grant within the last five years have made the requisite progress towards full compliance. If an executive fails to comply with stock ownership policy and annual progress requirements, the executive is not eligible to receive grantsmust retain 100% of their vested long-term incentive plan shares. In addition, all executives, including NEOs, are prohibited from selling Company stock acquired by exercising stock options SARs, performance shares, or any other awards underuntil such executive is in compliance with the 2011 Incentive Plan, until the executive complies with these requirements.ownership requirement.
Hedging and Trading Restrictions
The Company has an Insider Trading Policy which,that, among other things, prohibits NEOs, officers, Directorsdirectors and employees from hedging the economic risk of their stock ownership in the Company’s Common Stock. This policy bars NEOs, officers, directors and employees from purchasing financial instruments or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of Company equity securities granted by the Company as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by the NEO, officer, director or employee. In addition, this policy prohibits short-selling of the Company’s securities. This policy also prohibits executivedirectors, officers Directors and covered employees from trading in the Company’s securities outside of trading window periods or without pre-clearance.
Post-Termination Benefits
The Company does not maintain any plans or other arrangements with its executives that provide for severance or post-termination compensation in the event of a future termination of the executive’s employment. In addition, there are no special considerations for Company executives in connection with terminations dueSubject to death, disability, for cause or voluntary choice, including retirement. TheCommittee approval, the Company may, however, occasionally enter into separation agreements or arrangements with its executives at the time of the executive’s termination of employment that provide for severance payments or benefits. In connection with Mr. Mason’s departureaddition, executives and other employees may receive accelerated vesting of equity awards in August 2017, the Companyevent of death or disability, and Mr. Mason entered into a Separation Agreement and Release (the “Separation Agreement”). Theprorated accelerated vesting of equity awards in the event of retirement, pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement are described under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” and the compensation that Mr. Mason received pursuant to the Separation Agreement is included in the Summary Compensation Table.applicable grant agreements.
Impact of Tax and Accounting Considerations
The Company monitors compensation and benefits-related accounting rules, securities rules, tax rules and all other federal and state regulations on an ongoing basis through internal sources and external sources such as consultants, advisors and outside legal counsel. The Company routinely considers such rules and regulations and their impact on plan design alternatives and Company performance.
32
Human Capital and Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) generally disallows a tax deduction for annual compensation paid to a chief executive officer and “covered employees” in excess of $1 million. For tax years beginning on or prior to December 31, 2017, the deduction limit included an exception for “qualified performance-based compensation.” However, the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) amended certain aspects of Section 162(m), including eliminating the exception for “qualified performance-based compensation,” effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Committee Report
The Tax Act provides for a grandfather provision, pursuant to which remuneration that is provided pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017,Human Capital and which has not been modified in any material respect on or after that date, will not be subject to the amendments made to Section 162(m) by the Tax Act. To the extent available, the Company intends to continue to treat “qualified performance-based compensation” that is grandfathered under the Tax Act as deductible compensation.
In developing and implementing executive compensation policies and programs, the Committee considers whether particular payments and awards are deductible for federal income tax purposes. However, the Committee retains the discretion and flexibility to award compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m), including compensation that would not have qualified as performance-based compensation under the requirements of Section 162(m) as in effect prior to the Tax Act.
Compensation and Development Committee Report
In 2017, the Company’s Compensation and Development Committee was comprised of the following independent Directors: Mr. Boyce, Mr. Dearth, Dr. Delgado, Mr. Lawton, Ms. Reed and Mr. Wehmer. Each of these Directors satisfies the New York Stock Exchange’s rules for independence. During 2017, Mr. Lawton served as Chairman of the Committee.
The Compensation and Development Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the management of the Company. Based on this review and discussion, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the proxy statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023.
Michael R. Boyce
Randall S. Dearth
Joaquin Delgado
Gregory E. Lawton
Jan Stern Reed
Edward J. Wehmer
COMPENSATION HUMAN CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENTCOMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Jan Stern Reed, Chair | ||
Lorinda A. Burgess | ||
Randall S. Dearth | ||
Joaquin Delgado | ||
Susan M. Lewis | ||
Edward J. Wehmer |
33
2023 Summary Compensation Table
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each of the NEOs for the fiscal yearsyear ended on December 31, 2015,2023 (and, to the extent applicable, December 31, 20162022, and December 31, 2017.2021). Additional information related to each component of compensation for the NEOs is provided above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary (1) | Stock Awards (2) | Option Awards (3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (4) | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (5) | All Other Compensation (6) | Total |
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. | 2017 | $890,000 | $734,588 | $1,140,017 | $627,770 | $186,810 | $115,184 | $3,694,369 |
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | 2016 | $833,333 | $642,765 | $1,018,606 | $1,619,167 | $93,424 | $94,007 | $4,301,302 |
2015 | $800,000 | $566,900 | $899,994 | $1,332,392 | — | $91,977 | $3,691,263 | |
Scott D. Beamer | 2017 | $375,833 | $174,001 | $269,990 | $168,911 | N/A | $46,133 | $1,034,868 |
Former Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2016 | $350,000 | $141,800 | $224,694 | $410,865 | N/A | $38,459 | $1,165,818 |
2015 | $322,683 | $113,364 | $179,996 | $315,807 | N/A | $36,900 | $968,750 | |
Scott R. Behrens | 2017 | $370,000 | $193,293 | $300,018 | $186,401 | $28,180 | $46,830 | $1,124,722 |
Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants | 2016 | $340,000 | $151,251 | $239,676 | $393,720 | $12,798 | $39,949 | $1,177,394 |
2015 | $315,000 | $151,165 | $239,994 | $302,879 | — | $39,578 | $1,048,616 | |
Jennifer Ansbro Hale | 2017 | $339,167 | $85,064 | $132,033 | $141,639 | N/A | $41,554 | $739,457 |
Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Arthur W. Mergner | 2017 | $364,583 | $193,293 | $300,018 | $93,438 | $45,114 | $45,149 | $1,041,595 |
Vice President – Supply Chain | 2016 | $320,000 | $151,251 | $239,676 | $359,328 | $21,847 | $37,083 | $1,129,185 |
2015 | $291,667 | $151,165 | $239,997 | $285,451 | N/A | $34,091 | $1,002,368 | |
Scott C. Mason | 2017 | $279,330 | $174,001 | $843,986 | — | N/A | $349,894 | $1,647,211 |
Former Vice President – Supply Chain | 2016 | $355,500 | $141,800 | $224,694 | $405,839 | N/A | $37,739 | $1,165,572 |
2015 | $333,000 | $113,364 | $179,996 | $307,607 | N/A | $37,721 | $971,688 |
____________________
|
|
| Stock Awards (3) Option Awards (4) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (5) Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (6) All Other Compensation (7) Scott R. Behrens (1) President and Chief Executive Officer Luis E. Rojo Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Robert J. Haire, Jr. Executive Vice President, Supply Chain David G. Kabbes Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Sean T. Moriarty Vice President and General Manager – Surfactants Arthur W. Mergner Former Executive Vice President, Supply Chain (1) Mr. Behrens was promoted to President and Chief Executive Officer on April 25, 2022. (2) Amount for 2023 for Mr. Mergner includes (a) vacation payout in the amount of $70,767 upon retirement and (b) fees for his consulting services after his retirement on July 3, 2023, in the amount of $100,000. (3) Amounts for 2023 include (a) the grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, and (b) performance share awards that are subject to performance-based vesting conditions and reflect the target outcome award value at the date of the grant in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. See Note 11, Stock-based Compensation, to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, for a discussion of relevant assumptions used in calculating the fair values pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718. These performance share awards are subject to achievement of the performance conditions as described in the section above entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Long-Term Incentive Compensation.” | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name | 2023 | |||
Scott R. Behrens | $ | 2,916,822 | ||
Luis E. Rojo | $ | 841,440 | ||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | $ | 555,558 | ||
David G. Kabbes | $ | 560,891 | ||
Sean T. Moriarty | $ | 560,891 | ||
Arthur W. Mergner | $ | 630,977 | ||
2017(4) Amounts for 2023 include the grant date fair value of SARs granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 11, Stock-based Compensation, to the
34
consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, for a discussion of relevant assumptions used in calculating the fair values pursuant to ASC Topic 718.
(5) Based on the Company’s financial performance in 2023, and the related decision of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee not to give credit for individual performance objectives in light of such financial performance, the NEOs did not earn Annual Incentive Awards for 2023.
(6) Amounts for 2023 reflect the actuarial increase in the present value of the NEO’s benefits under the Company’s pension plan determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements.
(7) Amounts for 2023 include Company contributions (including profit-sharing contributions) to each NEO’s defined contribution accounts as follows: Mr. Behrens: $65,030; Mr. Rojo: $37,683; Mr. Haire: $20,367; Mr. Kabbes: $32,109; Mr. Moriarty: $31,935; and Mr. Mergner: $15,749. Amounts for 2023 also include personal use of Company-leased vehicles and airline club membership fees. Amounts for 2023 for NEOs other than Mr. Haire also include long-term disability insurance premiums; such premiums amounted to $26,828 for Mr. Behrens. Amount for 2023 for Mr. Behrens also includes personal and family use of entertainment events. Amounts for 2023 for Messrs. Behrens and Rojo also include spousal travel and service awards. Amount for 2023 for Mr. Haire also includes relocation allowance ($10,000) and moving expenses ($17,715). Amount for 2023 for Mr. Mergner also includes personal and family use of the Company-owned condominium and retirement gifts.
35
2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
| Type of Award (1) | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
| Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
| All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
| Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) (3) |
| Closing Price on Grant Date ($/Sh) |
| Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (4) | ||||||||||||
Name | Threshold ($) |
| Target ($) (2) |
| Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) |
|
| |||||||||||||||
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. | MIP |
| — |
| $0 |
| $890,000 |
| $1,780,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SA |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,836 |
| 9,672 |
| 18,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $734,588 |
|
| SAR |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24,051 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $570,009 |
|
| NQS |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 24,051 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $570,009 |
|
Scott D. Beamer | MIP |
| — |
| $0 |
| $225,500 |
| $451,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SA |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,146 |
| 2,291 |
| 4,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $174,001 |
|
| SAR |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8,544 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $202,493 |
|
| NQS |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,848 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $67,498 |
|
Scott R. Behrens | MIP |
| — |
| $0 |
| $222,000 |
| $444,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SA |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,273 |
| 2,545 |
| 4,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $193,293 |
|
| SAR |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,494 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $225,008 |
|
| NQS |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,165 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $75,011 |
|
Jennifer Ansbro Hale | MIP |
| — |
| $0 |
| $203,500 |
| $407,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SA |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 560 |
| 1,120 |
| 2,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $85,064 |
|
| SAR |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,178 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $99,019 |
|
| NQS |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,393 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $33,014 |
|
Arthur W. Mergner | MIP |
| — |
| $0 |
| $218,750 |
| $437,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SA |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,273 |
| 2,545 |
| 4,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $193,293 |
|
| SAR |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,494 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $225,008 |
|
| NQS |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,165 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $75,011 |
|
Scott C. Mason | MIP |
| — |
| $0 |
| $140,500 |
| $281,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SA |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,146 |
| 2,291 |
| 4,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| $174,001 |
|
| SAR |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8,544 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $202,493 |
|
| NQS |
| 2/21/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,848 |
| $78.58 |
| $78.91 |
| $67,498 |
|
___________________
Type of Award (1) | Grant Date | Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) (3) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Threshold ($) | Target ($) (2) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scott R. Behrens | MIP | — | $ | 0 | $ | 933,333 | $ | 1,866,666 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SA | 2/14/2023 | 7,096 | 14,192 | 27,674 | $ | 1,495,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU | 2/14/2023 | 7,096 | $ | 779,992 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAR | 2/14/2023 | 19,742 | $ | 109.92 | $ | 780,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Luis E. Rojo | MIP | — | $ | 0 | $ | 405,625 | $ | 811,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SA | 2/14/2023 | 2,047 | 4,094 | 7,893 | $ | 431,508 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU | 2/14/2023 | 2,047 | $ | 225,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAR | 2/14/2023 | 5,695 | $ | 109.92 | $ | 225,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | MIP | — | $ | 0 | $ | 230,000 | $ | 460,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SA | 5/1/2023 | 1,650 | 3,299 | 6,433 | $ | 284,902 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU | 5/1/2023 | 1,649 | $ | 149,977 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAR | 5/1/2023 | 4,744 | $ | 90.95 | $ | 150,005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David G. Kabbes | MIP | — | $ | 0 | $ | 299,542 | $ | 599,084 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SA | 2/14/2023 | 1,365 | 2,729 | 5,322 | $ | 287,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU | 2/14/2023 | 1,365 | $ | 150,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAR | 2/14/2023 | 3,797 | $ | 109.92 | $ | 150,019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU | 10/16/2023 | 762 | $ | 49,995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | MIP | — | $ | 0 | $ | 343,750 | $ | 687,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SA | 2/14/2023 | 1,365 | 2,729 | 5,322 | $ | 287,637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU | 2/14/2023 | 1,365 | $ | 150,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAR | 2/14/2023 | 3,797 | $ | 109.92 | $ | 150,019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | MIP | — | $ | 0 | $ | 184,031 | $ | 368,062 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SA | 2/14/2023 | 1,535 | 3,070 | 5,987 | $ | 323,578 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RSU | 2/14/2023 | 1,535 | $ | 168,727 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAR | 2/14/2023 | 4,271 | $ | 109.92 | $ | 168,747 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Type of Award: MIP – Management Incentive Plan award; SA – stock award (performance shares); RSU – restricted stock units; SAR – stock appreciation |
(2) | Reflects Target payouts under the Company’s Management Incentive Plan. These Target amounts are based on the NEO’s base salary and position as of the date of grant. Actual amounts paid are set forth in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. |
(3) | Reflects the |
(4) | Reflects the grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 for |
36
Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172023 Fiscal Year-End
| Option Awards |
| Stock Awards | |||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (1) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date |
| Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (2) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (4) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (3) | |
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. | 35,766 |
| $37.51 | 2/6/2019 |
| 25,753 | $2,033,729 | 42,812 | $3,380,883 |
|
| 36,952 |
| $42.77 | 2/13/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38,844 |
| $63.11 | 2/18/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 37,752 |
| $61.91 | 2/17/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 57,766 |
| $41.16 | 2/16/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 69,482 | $43.85 | 2/22/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 48,102 | $78.58 | 2/20/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott D. Beamer | 5,620 |
| $59.30 | 7/22/2023 |
| 5,150 | $406,690 | 9,649 | $762,001 |
|
| 6,292 |
| $61.91 | 2/17/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11,553 |
| $41.16 | 2/16/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,327 | $43.85 | 2/22/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11,392 | $78.58 | 2/20/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott R. Behrens | 1,298 |
| $42.77 | 2/13/2022 |
| 6,867 | $542,300 | 10,424 | $823,187 |
|
| 2,590 |
| $63.11 | 2/18/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3,147 |
| $61.91 | 2/17/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,661 |
| $58.22 | 4/28/2024 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| 5,851 |
| $41.16 | 2/16/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16,349 | $43.85 | 2/22/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12,659 | $78.58 | 2/20/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Ansbro Hale |
| 8,175 | $43.85 | 2/22/2026 |
| — | — | 5,013 | $395,861 |
|
|
| 5,571 | $78.58 | 2/20/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur W. Mergner | 1,734 |
| $37.51 | 2/6/2019 |
| 6,867 | $542,300 | 10,424 | $823,187 |
|
| 2,076 |
| $42.77 | 2/13/2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,942 |
| $63.11 | 2/18/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 26,292 |
| $61.91 | 2/17/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,404 |
| $41.16 | 2/16/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16,349 | $43.85 | 2/22/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12,659 | $78.58 | 2/20/2027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott C. Mason | 3,242 |
| $42.77 | 2/13/2022 |
| 4,502 | $355,523 | 3,602 | $284,475 |
|
| 6,474 |
| $63.11 | 2/18/2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7,551 |
| $61.91 | 2/17/2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11,553 |
| $41.16 | 2/16/2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15,327 |
| $43.85 | 2/22/2026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (1) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (2) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (4) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scott R. Behrens | 3,165 | $78.58 | 2/20/2027 | 9,301 | $ | 879,410 | 17,058 | $1,612,829 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3,447 | $72.99 | 2/20/2028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13,499 | $92.29 | 2/19/2029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13,884 | $102.30 | 2/18/2030 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16,443 | $123.73 | 2/16/2031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16,811 | 8,406 | $111.26 | 2/15/2032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9,001 | 18,002 | $98.00 | 4/24/2032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19,742 | $109.92 | 2/13/2033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Luis E. Rojo | 7,461 | $70.86 | 5/1/2028 | 3,535 | $ | 334,234 | 4,453 | $421,003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13,499 | $92.29 | 2/19/2029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13,884 | $102.30 | 2/18/2030 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11,099 | $123.73 | 2/16/2031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8,966 | 4,483 | $111.26 | 2/15/2032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5,695 | $109.92 | 2/13/2033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | 4,744 | $90.95 | 4/30/2033 | 1,649 | $ | 155,913 | 1,155 | $109,172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
David G. Kabbes | 12,077 | $93.33 | 7/22/2029 | 3,229 | $ | 305,302 | 3,220 | $304,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11,571 | $102,30 | 2/18/2030 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8,221 | $123.73 | 2/16/2031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6,724 | 3,363 | $111.26 | 2/15/2032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3,797 | $109.92 | 2/13/2033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | 3,797 | $78.58 | 2/20/2027 | 2,688 | $ | 254,150 | 3,220 | $304,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3,218 | $72.99 | 2/20/2028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10,124 | $92.29 | 2/19/2029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10,413 | $102.30 | 2/18/2030 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9,867 | $123.73 | 2/16/2031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6,724 | 3,363 | $111.26 | 2/15/2032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3,797 | $109.92 | 2/13/2033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | 12,659 | $78.58 | 2/20/2027 | 1,226 | $ | 115,918 | 1,378 | $130,318 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13,787 | $72.99 | 2/20/2028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13,499 | $92.29 | 2/19/2029 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13,884 | $102.30 | 2/18/2030 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7,400 | $123.73 | 2/16/2031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3,782 | $111.26 | 2/15/2032 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 475 | $109.92 | 2/13/2033 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
37
____________________
(1) | Reflects |
Name | SARs (#) | Options (#) | Vesting Date |
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. | 34,741 | 34,741 | 2/22/2018 |
| 8,017 | 8,017 | 2/21/2018 |
| 8,017 | 8,017 | 2/21/2019 |
| 8,016 | 8,016 | 2/21/2020 |
Scott D. Beamer | 11,495 | 3,832 | 2/22/2018 |
| 2,849 | 949 | 2/21/2018 |
| 2,848 | 949 | 2/21/2019 |
| 2,848 | 949 | 2/21/2020 |
Scott R. Behrens | 12,262 | 4,087 | 2/22/2018 |
| 3,165 | 1,055 | 2/21/2018 |
| 3,164 | 1,055 | 2/21/2019 |
| 3,164 | 1,055 | 2/21/2020 |
Jennifer Ansbro Hale | 6,131 | 2,044 | 2/22/2018 |
| 1,393 | 465 | 2/21/2018 |
| 1,393 | 464 | 2/21/2019 |
| 1,392 | 464 | 2/21/2020 |
Arthur W. Mergner | 12,262 | 4.087 | 2/22/2018 |
| 3,165 | 1,055 | 2/21/2018 |
| 3,164 | 1,055 | 2/21/2019 |
| 3,164 | 1,055 | 2/21/2020 |
|
|
|
|
| Name | SARs (#) | Vesting Date | ||||||
| 6,580 | 2/14/2024 | ||||||
| 9,001 | 4/25/2024 | |||||||
| 8,406 | 12/31/2024 | |||||||
| 6,581 | 2/14/2025 | |||||||
| 9,001 | 4/25/2025 | |||||||
| 6,581 | 2/14/2026 | |||||||
| 1,898 | 2/14/2024 | ||||||
| 4,483 | 12/31/2024 | |||||||
| 1,898 | 2/14/2025 | |||||||
| 1,899 | 2/14/2026 | |||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | 1,581 | 5/1/2024 | ||||||
| 1,581 | 5/1/2025 | |||||||
| 1,582 | 5/1/2026 | |||||||
David G. Kabbes | 1,265 | 2/14/2024 | ||||||
| 3,363 | 12/31/2024 | |||||||
| 1,266 | 2/14/2025 | |||||||
| 1,266 | 2/14/2026 | |||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | 1,265 | 2/14/2024 | ||||||
| 3,363 | 12/31/2024 | |||||||
| 1,266 | 2/14/2025 | |||||||
| 1,266 | 2/14/2026 | |||||||
| (2) | For NEOs other than Mr. Haire, reflects stock awards granted in February |
| Name | RSUs (#) | Vesting Date | ||||||
| 2,365 | 2/14/2024 | ||||||
| 2,365 | 2/14/2025 | |||||||
| 2,366 | 2/14/2026 | |||||||
| 682 | 2/14/2024 | |||||||
| 682 | 2/14/2025 | |||||||
| 683 | 2/14/2026 | |||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | 549 | 5/1/2024 | ||||||
| 550 | 5/1/2025 | |||||||
| 550 | 5/1/2026 | |||||||
David G. Kabbes | 455 | 2/14/2024 | ||||||
| 254 | 10/16/2024 | |||||||
| 455 | 2/14/2025 | |||||||
| 254 | 10/16/2025 | |||||||
| 455 | 2/14/2026 | |||||||
| 254 | 10/16/2026 | |||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | 455 | 2/14/2024 | ||||||
| 455 | 2/14/2025 | |||||||
| 455 | 2/14/2026 | |||||||
| (3) | The market value of stock awards reported in this table is based on the |
38
(4) | Reflects stock awards that will vest as set forth in the table below based on the Company’s achievement of pre-established performance goals. The number of shares that vest following the ROIC performance period ending December 31, |
Name | Stock Awards (#) | Last Day of Performance Period | ||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
Scott R. Behrens |
| 11,515 | 12/31/ | |
| 7,096 | 12/31/2025 | |||
Luis E. Rojo |
| 2,876 | 12/31/ | |
| 2,047 | 12/31/2025 | |||
|
| 1,650 | 12/31/ | |
David G. Kabbes | 2,157 | 12/31/2024 | ||
| 1,365 | 12/31/2025 | |||
| 2,157 | 12/31/ | ||
| 1,365 | 12/31/2025 | |||
Arthur W. Mergner |
| 2,427 | 12/31/ | |
| 12/31/ | |||
|
|
|
201739
2023 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
| Option Awards (1) |
| Stock Awards (2) | ||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) (3) | |||||
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. | 54,348 | $3,166,014 | 8,693 | $682,574 | |||||
Scott D. Beamer | — | — | 1,449 | $113,775 | |||||
Scott R. Behrens | 9,553 | $353,282 | 2,267 | $178,005 | |||||
Jennifer Ansbro Hale | — | — | — | — | |||||
Arthur W. Mergner | — | — | 1,449 | $113,775 | |||||
Scott C. Mason | — | — | 1,739 | $136,546 | |||||
____________________
| Option Awards (1) | Stock Awards (2) | |||||||||||||
| Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) (3) | ||||||||||
Scott R. Behrens | — | — | 3,833 | $ | 402,350 | |||||||||
Luis E. Rojo | — | — | 3,833 | $ | 402,350 | |||||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
David G. Kabbes | — | — | 3,194 | $ | 335,274 | |||||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | — | — | 2,875 | $ | 301,789 | |||||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | 14,200 | $ | 786,566 | 3,833 | $ | 402,350 | ||||||||
(1) | Reflects exercises of stock options and stock-settled SARs. |
(2) | The stock awards, which were granted in |
(3) |
|
40
2023 Pension Benefits
The pension values included in the table below are the present value of the benefits expected to be paid in the future under the Company’s Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees and the SERP.Employees. The amount of each future payment is based on the current accrued pension benefit and the values of the benefits issued under these plans are determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in the Company’s financial statements. The retirement age is the earliest unreduced retirement age as defined in each plan. The Company froze the Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees in 2006. Further information regarding the Company’s Retirement Plans is provided above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
For the Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees and the SERP amounts included in the Present Value of Accumulated Benefit column, the normal retirement benefit is based on the following formula:
50% of final average earnings less 50% of the participant’s primary Social Security benefit multiplied by service up to 30 years divided by 30.
Normal Retirement: Age 65.
Early Retirement: Retirement before age 65 but after attaining age 55 and completing five years of vesting service. The normal retirement benefit is reduced by 0.33% per month for each month between the date on which payments begin and the date of the participant’s 63rd birthday. F. Quinn Stepan, Jr.Arthur W. Mergner is currently eligible forto begin early retirement.retirement benefits.
Service: Credited from the date of hire to June 30, 2006, with a maximum of 30 years.
Final Average Earnings: Highest consecutive five years of base compensation during last ten years of service through June 30, 2006. This amount is limited for the Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees to the amount allowed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) regulations.
The specific assumptions used in estimating the amounts in the Present Value of Accumulated Benefit column include:
Assumed Retirement Age: Pension benefits are assumed to begin at each participant’s earliest unreduced retirement age, but not before the participant’s current age. The earliest unreduced retirement age is 63 for both plans.
Discount Rate: The applicable discount rate as of December 31, 20172023, was 3.7%5.2%.
Mortality Table: The mortality table used as of December 31, 2015, is the RP-2015 table (RP-2014 mortality table with scale MP-2014 improvements from 2006-2014 removed) projected forward generationally using MP-2015 improvement scale. The 2015 table has slightly higher mortality rates relative to the table used for 2014. The mortality table used as of December 31, 2016, is the RP-2016 table (RP-2014 mortality table with scale MP-2014 improvements from 2006-2014 removed) projected forward generationally using MP-2016 improvement scale. The 2016 table has slightly higher mortality rates relative to the table used for 2015. The mortality table used as of December 31, 2017 is the RP-2017 table (RP-2014 mortality table adjusted backward to 2006 with MP-2014 improvements) projected forward generationally using MP-2017 improvement scale.
| • | Mortality Table: The mortality table used as of December 31, 2021, is the Pri-2012 table (with contingent survivor mortality rates used after the original retiree’s death) projected forward generationally using Order 2 variation of scale MP-2021 with separate improvement tables for males and females. The mortality table used as of December 31, 2022, is the Pri-2012 table (with contingent survivor mortality rates used after the original retiree’s death) projected forward generationally using Order 2 variation of scale MP-2021 with separate improvement tables for males and females. There was no update to mortality. The mortality table used as of December 31, 2023, is the Pri-2012 table (with contingent survivor mortality rates used after the original retiree’s death) projected forward generationally using Order 2 variation of scale MP-2021 with separate improvement tables for males and females. There was no update to mortality. |
41
The information shown in the table below has been developed based on actuarial assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable. Other actuarial assumptions could also be considered to be reasonable and would result in different values.
Name |
| Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | |||
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. |
| Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | 20.7 |
| $774,652 |
| — |
|
|
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | 20.7 |
| $898,296 |
| — |
|
Scott D. Beamer |
| Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
|
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
Scott R. Behrens |
| Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | 13.4 |
| $186,614 |
| — |
|
|
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
Jennifer Ansbro Hale |
| Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
|
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
Arthur W. Merger |
| Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | 17.4 |
| $359,741 |
| — |
|
|
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
Scott C. Mason |
| Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
|
| Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan | N/A |
| N/A |
| N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name | Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#) | Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) | Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) | ||||||||
Scott R. Behrens | Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | 13.4 | $ 172,726 | — | ||||||||
Luis E. Rojo | Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
David G. Kabbes | Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | 13.8 | $ 178,982 | — | ||||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees | 17.4 | $ 363,725 | — | ||||||||
42
2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Pursuant to the Company’s Management Incentive Plan, certain executives, including the NEOs, may defer annual incentive awards earned. Deferral elections are made by eligible executives in June of each year for the amounts to be earned for that year. An executive may defer all or a portion of his or her award pursuant to the provisions of the Management Incentive Plan. Deferred amounts are credited with earnings or losses based on the rate of return of mutual funds selected by the executive, which the executive may change as allowed under the Management Incentive Plan. Additional information regarding the Management Incentive Plan is included in the “Elements of Compensation” section of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
After an executive has elected to defer all or a portion of his or her annual incentive awards, no amounts can be paid until the executive has separated from service with the Company in accordance with the provisions of the Management Incentive Plan. At that time, benefits in the executive’s account shall be paid in a single sum or in substantially equal annual installments over three, five or ten years, as elected by the executive.
Executives may also elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of certain incentive compensation payments in accordance with the Stepan Company Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan (effective January 1, 2008) (the “Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan”). Information regarding deferrals under the Management Incentive Plan and Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan is included in the table below.
Name |
| Plan |
| Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) (1) |
| Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
| Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
| Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) |
| Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($) | |||||||||||||||||
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. |
| Management Incentive Plan |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| (162,353) |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 7,947,223 |
|
| |||
|
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
| 2,080,216 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| (292,142) |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 10,056,564 |
|
| |||
Scott D. Beamer |
| N/A |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
| ||
Scott R. Behrens |
| Management Incentive Plan |
|
| 65,240 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 5,492 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 908,879 |
|
| ||
|
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
| 554,740 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| (8,249) |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 259,387 |
|
| |||
Jennifer Ansbro Hale |
| N/A |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
| ||
Arthur W. Mergner |
| Management Incentive Plan |
|
| 93,438 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 69,548 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 759,726 |
|
| ||
|
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan |
|
| 554,740 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 938 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 115,607 |
|
| ||
Scott C. Mason |
| Management Incentive Plan |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 53,017 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 458,855 |
|
| ||
____________________
| Name | Plan | Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) (1) | Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) | Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last Fiscal Year ($) (2) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End ($) (3) | ||||||||||||||||
Scott R. Behrens | Management Incentive Plan | — | — | (84,011 | ) | — | 1,775,204 | |||||||||||||||
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan | — | — | (127,215 | ) | — | 1,030,955 | ||||||||||||||||
Luis E. Rojo | Management Incentive Plan | — | — | 169,094 | — | 1,237,333 | ||||||||||||||||
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan | — | — | (39,713 | ) | — | 366,889 | ||||||||||||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | Management Incentive Plan | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
David G. Kabbes | Management Incentive Plan | — | — | 19,192 | — | 232,140 | ||||||||||||||||
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | Management Incentive Plan | — | — | (48,471 | ) | — | 594,220 | |||||||||||||||
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | Management Incentive Plan | — | — | 21,165 | — | 1,653,056 | ||||||||||||||||
| Performance Award Deferred Compensation Plan | — | — | (319,448 | ) | — | 2,633,866 | ||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Reflects annual incentive awards deferred, if any, under the Management Incentive Plan for |
| (2) | These amounts are not included in the Summary Compensation Table for 2023 because the amounts included in this column do not include above-market or preferential earnings. |
| (3) | The following amounts reported in this column previously were reported as compensation in prior years’ Summary Compensation Tables: Mr. Behrens: $1,894,200, Mr. Rojo: $1,556,899, Mr. Kabbes: $212,948, Mr. Moriarty: $47,554 and Mr. Mergner: $4,009,628. |
43
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Other than the Separation Agreement described below, theThe Company has no contracts, agreements, plans or other arrangements with its executives that provide for severance payments to NEOs in connection with a termination or change in control.control of the Company other than (1) benefits and payments disclosed in the 2023 Pension Benefits and 2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation tables above, (2) employee benefit plans and arrangements that do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers and that are generally available to all salaried employees and (3) the long-term incentive awards, which provide for accelerated vesting on termination or change in control as described below. The Company may, however, occasionally enter into separation agreements with its executives at the time of the executive’s termination of employment that provide for severance payments or benefits.
In connection with Mr. Mason’s departure in August 2017, the CompanyRSUs and Mr. Mason entered into the Separation Agreement. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, in consideration of Mr. Mason’s execution, delivery and non-revocation of a general release of claims and his continued compliance with the terms and conditions of the Separation Agreement, Mr. Mason was entitled to receive the following: (i) a cash amount equal to $397,232 (50% of which was to be paid in 2017 and 50% of which was to be paid in 2018), (ii) a prorated portion constituting 62.5% of any 2017 incentive bonus awardSARs granted under the Company’s Management2022 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan that would otherwise have been payablevest on a pro rata basis upon retirement and vest in full upon a termination of employment due to Mr. Mason under such plan had he remained employed with the Company through December 31, 2017, (iii) a prorated portion constituting 62.5% of any profit sharing awarddeath or disability. Performance shares granted under the Company’s SIRP that would otherwise have been payable2022 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan or under the Company’s 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan remain outstanding and eligible to Mr. Mason under such plan had he remained employed withvest based on actual performance on a pro rata basis in the case of retirement and in full in the case of death or disability. Under the 2022 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, (a) if a replacement award is not granted, upon a change in control or (b) if a replacement award is granted, upon a termination by the Company through December 31, 2017,without cause or a termination by the employee for good reason within two years following a change in control, outstanding RSUs and (iv)SARs vest in full and performance shares vest at the applicable target payout. The 2011 Incentive Compensation Plan does not require accelerated vesting of stock option awards covering 3,832(i) RSUs or SARs in the event a termination of employment due to retirement, death or disability or in connection with a change in control or (ii) performance shares in connection with a change in control.
44
The table below quantifies the estimated benefit to NEOs other than Mr. Mergner in connection with a trigger occurring on the last business day of the Company’s 2023 fiscal year based on a share price of $94.55, the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 29, 2023. Because Mr. Mergner retired from the Company on July 3, 2023, the following table does not show estimated benefits to Mr. Mergner in connection with a death, disability or change in control triggering event. The amounts shown for Mr. Mergner reflect the value of the outstanding RSUs and SARs awards covering 11,495the vesting of which accelerated upon his retirement. The amounts shown for Mr. Mergner also reflect the value of performance shares grantedthat remained outstanding at Mr. Mergner’s retirement and were eligible to Mr. Mason duringvest after the 2016 calendar year. Mr. Mason forfeited equity-based awards that were granted in 2017. Mr. Mason’s other equity-based awards were treated in accordance with the terms and conditionsend of the applicable Company plans and award agreements pursuant to which they were granted.performance periods. The compensation thatclosing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of Mr. Mason received pursuant toMergner’s retirement was $95.47. The performance share amounts for all NEOs assume performance at target levels for the Separation Agreement is included in the Summary Compensation Table.applicable performance periods.
| Name | Type of Award | Retirement ($) | Death or Disability ($) | Qualifying Termination in Connection with Change in Control ($) | ||||||||||
Scott R. Behrens | RSUs | 186,369 | 670,927 | 670,927 | ||||||||||
| SARs | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Performance Shares | 1,478,794 | 2,736,277 | 1,341,854 | |||||||||||
| Total | 1,665,162 | 3,407,204 | 2,012,780 | |||||||||||
Luis E. Rojo | RSUs | 53,762 | 193,544 | 193,544 | ||||||||||
| SARs | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Performance Shares | 516,621 | 865,322 | 387,088 | |||||||||||
| Total | 570,383 | 1,058,865 | 580,632 | |||||||||||
Robert J. Haire, Jr. | RSUs | 34,647 | 155,913 | 155,913 | ||||||||||
| SARs | 3,795 | 17,078 | 17,078 | |||||||||||
| Performance Shares | 103,973 | 311,920 | 311,920 | |||||||||||
| Total | 142,416 | 484,912 | 484,912 | |||||||||||
David G. Kabbes | RSUs | 39,853 | 201,108 | 201,108 | ||||||||||
| SARs | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Performance Shares | 374,765 | 614,764 | 258,027 | |||||||||||
| Total | 414,618 | 815,872 | 459,135 | |||||||||||
Sean T. Moriarty | RSUs | 35,850 | 129,061 | 129,061 | ||||||||||
| SARs | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Performance Shares | 354,447 | 645,398 | 258,027 | |||||||||||
| Total | 390,297 | 774,459 | 387,088 | |||||||||||
Arthur W. Mergner | RSUs | 16,283 | ||||||||||||
| SARs | — | |||||||||||||
| Performance Shares | 338,298 | |||||||||||||
| Total | 354,581 | |||||||||||||
45
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the ratio of the annual total compensation of the Company’s median employee to the annual total compensation of F. Quinn Stepan, Jr.,Scott R. Behrens, the Company’s ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer. We consider the pay ratio specified below to be a reasonable estimate, calculated in a manner that is intended to be consistent with the requirements of Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:2023:
The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company, except the ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer, was $105,414;$72,284;
The annual total compensation of the Company’s ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer was $3,694,371;$4,123,893; and
The ratio of the median of the annual total compensation of all Company employees, other than the Company’s ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer, to the annual total compensation of the Company’s ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer was approximately 1 to 35.57.
The Company chose December 31, 20172023, as the date for determining the employee population used to identify the median employee. The Company identified the median employee using the base salaries of all employees globally, converting local currency non-U.S. base salaries into U.S. dollars using December 29, 201731, 2023, exchange rates. Permanent employees who joined in 20172023 and permanent employees who were on leave during 20172023 were assumed to have worked for the entire year. The Company used base salaries to identify the median employee because the Company does not widely distribute annual equity awards to employees and because this measure approximately reflects the total annual compensation of employees. The Company calculated the median employee’s and the ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer’s annual total compensation consistent with the disclosure requirements for the Summary Compensation Table. For purposes of this calculation, the median employee’s annual total compensation consisted of wages, premium pay (including overtime, holiday pay and shift differential), paid time off, non-equity incentive plan compensation, change in pension value and retirement plan contributions.
46
Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for First Principal Executive Officer (PEO) (1) | Compensation Actually Paid to First PEO (2)(3) | Summary Compensation Table Total for Second (PEO) (1) | Compensation Actually Paid to Second PEO (2)(3) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (NEOs) (1) | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs (2)(3) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On: | Net Income (millions) (5) | Adjusted Net Income (millions) (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shareholder Return | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 4,123,893 | $ | 1,047,254 | — | — | $ | 1,166,988 | $ | 486,718 | $ | 97 | $ | 143 | $ | 40.2 | $ | 50.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 4,959,346 | $ | 5,118,772 | $ | 4,745,670 | $ | 243,286 | $ | 1,622,615 | $ | 1,470,109 | $ | 108 | $ | 130 | $ | 147.2 | $ | 153.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | — | — | $ | 5,380,963 | $ | 5,838,352 | $ | 1,556,535 | $ | 1,666,269 | $ | 124 | $ | 116 | $ | 137.8 | $ | 143.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | — | — | $ | 6,330,645 | $ | 8,750,899 | $ | 1,705,840 | $ | 2,223,882 | $ | 118 | $ | 116 | $ | 126.8 | $ | 132.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | For 2022 and 2023, the first PEO listed is Scott R. Behrens, who became President and Chief Executive Officer on April 25, 2022, and the second PEO listed is F. Quinn Stepan, Jr., who served as President and Chief Executive Officer until April 25, 2022. For 2020 and 2021, F. Quinn Stepan Jr. was the PEO but is designated second PEO in the chart for those years. Our other NEOs for the covered years were as follows: |
2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |||
| Luis E. Rojo | Luis E. Rojo | Luis E. Rojo | Luis E. Rojo | |||
| Arthur W. Mergner | Arthur W. Mergner | Arthur W. Mergner | Arthur W. Mergner | |||
| David G. Kabbes | Sean T. Moriarty | David G. Kabbes | David G. Kabbes | |||
| Scott R. Behrens | Scott R. Behrens | Sean T. Moriarty | Sean T. Moriarty | |||
| Robert J. Haire, Jr. | ||||||
| (2) | The following adjustments relating to equity awards were made to total compensation to determine CAP for 2023: |
Year | Value of Equity Awards Disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table (Stock Awards and Option Awards Columns) | Year End Value of Equity Awards Granted During the Covered Year | Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards as of Covered Year-End | Fair Value of Awards Granted and Vesting in the Covered Year | Value of Awards Granted in Prior Years Vesting During the Covered Year | Value of Awards Granted in Prior Years that Fail to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During the Covered Year | Total Equity Award Adjustments | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 First PEO | -$ | 3,055,835 | $ | 1,179,324 | -$ | 835,066 | $ | 0 | -$ | 347,271 | $ | 0 | -$ | 3,058,848 | ||||||||||||||
2023 Average Non-PEO NEO | -$ | 670,569 | $ | 298,733 | -$ | 102,574 | $ | 5,980 | -$ | 90,433 | -$ | 111,389 | -$ | 670,253 | ||||||||||||||
| The valuation methodologies used to calculate fair values for each measurement date do not materially differ from those used at the time of grant of each respective award. |
| (3) | The following adjustments relating to the Company’s frozen defined benefit and pension plans (as applicable) were made to total compensation for each year to determine CAP: |
Aggregate Change in Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits | Service Cost and Prior Service Cost of Pension Benefits | Total Pension Benefit Adjustments | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year | First PEO | Non-PEO NEOs | First PEO | Non-PEO NEOs | First PEO | Non-PEO NEOs | ||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | -$17,791 | -$10,017 | $0 | $0 | -$ | 17,791 | -$ | 10,017 | ||||||||||||||
| (4) | Represents the cumulative total shareholder return (“TSR”) for the Dow Jones U.S. Chemicals Index. |
| (5) | The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year (GAAP net income). |
| (6) | Adjusted net income represents the most important financial performance measure used by the Company to link CAP for 2023 to Company performance. 4 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Overview of Director Compensation Program
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee engaged Exequity as its independent consultant for Board compensation for 2023. Exequity advises the Committee on Board compensation matters such as the annual retainer fee, Board committee chair fees, and stock awards based on the Company’s peer group and market competitiveness. The Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board of Directors.Board. The CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee annually reviews the adequacy and competitiveness of the amount of the annual retainer fee, Board committee chairmenchair fees, and stock awards, and makes adjustments as it deems appropriate.
Directors’ Fees
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, Directors2023, directors who were not also employees of the Company (“(“Non-Employee Directors”) were paid an annual retainer fee (“Annual Director Retainer Fee”) of $80,000.$100,000. The non-executive Chairman of the Board was paid an additional annual fee of $225,000. The Lead Independent Director was paid an additional annual fee of $15,000,$20,000, the ChairmanChair of the Audit Committee was paid an additional annual fee of $20,000, the ChairmanChair of the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee was paid an additional annual fee of $15,000,$20,000, the Chair of the Compliance Committee was paid an additional annual fee of $20,000, and the ChairmanChair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was paid an additional annual fee of $10,000.$20,000. No fees or other compensation for service as a Directordirector were paid to Directorsdirectors who were also employees of the Company.
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan
A Non-Employee Director may defer receipt of his Directoror her director compensation into one or more available investment options offered under the Stepan Company Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (as amended and restated as of January 1, 2012) (the “Directors Deferred Compensation Plan”). At the election of a Non-Employee Director, deferred payments generally may be made in shares of Common Stock or cash, depending upon the election made by the Non-Employee Director.
Stock Awards and Incentive Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors
Pursuant to the 20112022 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan and upon the terms and conditions as determined by the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee, each Non-Employee Director serving as a Directordirector of the Company on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders each year will beis typically awarded an annual stock award (“Annual Stock Award”). At the Non-Employee Director’s election, the Annual Stock Award is either delivered at the time of the grant or deferred. For 2017,2023, each Non-Employee Director serving as a Directordirector of the Company on April 25, 20172023, received an Annual Stock Award of 1,0441,325 shares of Common Stock. The number of shares was determined by dividing $90,000$125,000 by $86.16,$94.32, the average of the opening and closing prices of Common Stock on the day of grant. The Annual Stock Award is vested upon grant and dividend equivalents are paidcredited on deferred Annual Stock Awards. The Non-Employee Directors did not receive any other stock option or stock grants in 2017.2023.
In addition to the Annual Stock Awards, under the 20112022 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee is also permitted to make grants of stock options or additional stock awards to Non-Employee Directors at the times and in the amounts and subject to such other terms and conditions as determined by the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee in its sole discretion. The CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee granted no such awards in 2017.2023.
50
Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Ownership Policy
The Company maintains a Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Ownership Policy whichthat requires each Non-Employee Director to own a minimum amount of Common Stock equivalent in value to five times the current Annual Director Retainer Fee. During the first thirty-six months of service eligible directors are encouraged, but not required, to progress toward compliance in twenty percent increments up to sixty percent. After thirty-six months of service eligible Directors are required to demonstrate progress toward the stock ownership requirement by complying with eighty percent of the required ownership level after year four and one hundred percent of the required ownership level after five years. The following shares count towards the stock ownership requirements: (i) shares owned directly or by any immediate family member, (ii) shares owned indirectly as trustee or custodian for the benefit of children and family members, and (iii) shares held in the Non-Employee Director’s deferred compensation plan accounts. Stock options do not count towards the stock ownership requirements unless actually exercised.
Each Non-Employee Director has five years from the date of his or her initial election or appointment as a Directordirector to achieve compliance with these stock ownership requirements. Compliance with the stock ownership policy for all Non-Employee Directors is reviewed on an annual basis. Currently, all Non-Employee Directors are in compliance with stock ownership requirements; Non‑EmployeeNon-Employee Directors appointed over five years ago are in full compliance and Non-Employee Directors appointed within the last five years have made the requisite progress towards full compliance. Any Non-Employee Director who is not in compliance with the required stock ownership level will not be eligible for any additional, discretionary grantsmust retain 100% of stock optionshis or stock awardsher vested shares (after tax) until compliance is achieved.
Hedging and Trading Restrictions
The Company’s Insider Trading Policy also applies to Non-Employee Directors. This policy, among other things, prohibits Non-Employee Directors from hedging the economic risk of their stock ownership in the Company’s Common Stock, short-selling the Company’s securities, or trading in the Company’s securities outside of trading window periods or without pre-clearance.
20172023 Director Compensation Table
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to Non-Employee Directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.2023.
Name (1) | Fees Earned | Stock Awards (2) | All Other Compensation (3) | Total | ||||
Michael R. Boyce | $90,000 | $89,951 | — | $179,951 | ||||
Randall S. Dearth | $80,000 | $89,951 | — | $169,951 | ||||
Joaquin Delgado | $80,000 | $89,951 | — | $169,951 | ||||
Gregory E. Lawton | $95,000 | $89,951 | — | $184,951 | ||||
Jan Stern Reed | $80,000 | $89,951 | — | $169,951 | ||||
F. Quinn Stepan | $80,000 | $89,951 | $30,177 | $200,128 | ||||
Edward J. Wehmer | $115,000 | $89,951 | — | $204,951 |
| |||
____________________
| Name (1) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards (2) | Total | |||||||||
Lorinda A. Burgess | $ | 120,000 | $ | 124,974 | $ | 244,974 | ||||||
Randall S. Dearth | $ | 105,604 | $ | 124,974 | $ | 230,578 | ||||||
Joaquin Delgado | $ | 120,000 | $ | 124,974 | $ | 244,974 | ||||||
Gregory E. Lawton | $ | 75,916 | $ | 124,974 | $ | 200,890 | ||||||
Jan Stern Reed | $ | 120,000 | $ | 124,974 | $ | 244,974 | ||||||
F. Quinn Stepan, Jr. | $ | 325,000 | $ | 124,974 | $ | 449,974 | ||||||
Edward J. Wehmer | $ | 120,000 | $ | 124,974 | $ | 244,974 | ||||||
(1) |
|
(2) | Reflects stock awards granted in April |
|
|
51
PROPOSAL NO. 2: ADVISORY VOTE ONTO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
As required under the Dodd-Frank Act and Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Company is including in this proxy statement a non-binding advisory vote regardingto approve the compensation of the Company’s NEOs. Each year, the Company asks for the stockholders to indicate their approval of the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs. The compensation paid in 20172023 is described in this proxy statement in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis as well as the compensation tables and related narratives. Those sections describe the Company’s NEO compensation programs and the rationale behind the decisions made by the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee.
This Say-on-Pay vote provides stockholders with the opportunity to express their views about the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs as described in this proxy statement. A stockholder may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” the resolution or may “ABSTAIN” from voting on the resolution. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.on this matter. The result of the Say-on-Pay vote will not be binding on the Company or the Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors values the views of the Company’s stockholders and will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding compensation of the Company’s NEOs. At the 20172023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company’s executive compensation was approved by approximately 97%98% of the votes cast at the meeting on the proposal. The Board of Directors and the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee considered these voting results when they made decisions regarding the compensation of the Company’s NEOs. Unless the Board of Directors modifies its determination on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes, the next such advisory vote will be held at the 2019 annual meeting2025 Annual Meeting of stockholders.Stockholders. The Company anticipates next seeking an advisory vote on the frequency of Say-on-Pay votes at its 2029 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s executive compensation program is appropriately designed and is operating effectively to compensate the Company’s NEOs based on achievement of annual and long-term performance goals that are aligned with enhanced stockholder value. As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Company’s objectives for its compensation program, including the compensation program for the NEOs, are as follows:
motivate employees to achieve and maintain a high level of performance, and drive results that will help the Company achieve its goals;
align the interests of our employees with the interests of our stockholders;
provide for market-competitive levels of compensation; and
attract and retain employees of outstanding ability.
In support of these objectives, the CompensationHuman Capital and DevelopmentCompensation Committee follows these guiding principles for setting and awarding NEO executive compensation:
Pay for Performance. The basic premise of the Company’s NEO compensation philosophy is to pay for performance. The Company’s intention is to foster a performance-driven culture with competitive total compensation as a key driver for executive employees. Compensation levels commensurate with Company performance align the interests of the Company’s NEOs with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. For 2017, incentive pay was directly connected to Company and individual performance. See both the “Short-Term Incentive Compensation” and the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” sections in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this proxy statement for a discussion on the connection between Company performance and compensation levels for each incentive compensation component.
| • | Pay for Performance. The basic premise of the Company’s NEO compensation philosophy is to pay for performance. The Company’s intention is to foster a performance-driven culture with competitive total compensation as a key driver for executive employees. Compensation levels commensurate with Company performance align the interests of the Company’s NEOs with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. For 2023, incentive pay was directly connected to Company and individual performance. See the “Short-Term Incentive Compensation” and the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” sections in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this proxy statement for a discussion on the connection between Company performance and compensation levels for each incentive compensation component. |
52
Competitive Compensation. Base salaries were surveyed and determined to be consistent with similar positions in similar industries. The Company believes that the level of 2017 executive compensation offered as part of its total reward components was necessary to attract and retain talented NEOs. See the “Compensation Peer Group and Survey Data” section in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this proxy statement for a description of the process used for comparing the Company’s compensation programs with those of the Company’s peers.
Equity-Based Compensation Aligns the Company with the Interests of Stockholders. The Compensation and Development Committee has designed the compensation for NEOs to depend on the achievement of objective performance goals that drive, and are aligned with, stockholder value. Information related to the amount of NEO compensation that is paid as stock options, SARs and performance shares is described in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this proxy statement.
Stock Ownership Policy. The Company maintains a stock ownership policy because it believes that ownership of Company stock by key executives is desirable in order to focus both short-term and long-term decision-making on the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. See the “Stock Ownership Policy” section in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this proxy statement for a more detailed description of this policy.
| • | Competitive Compensation. Base salaries were surveyed and determined to be consistent with similar positions in similar industries. The Company believes that the level of 2023 executive compensation offered as part of its total reward components was necessary to attract and retain talented NEOs. See the “Compensation Peer Group and Survey Data” section in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this proxy statement for a description of the process used for comparing the Company’s compensation programs with those of the Company’s peers. |
| • | Equity-Based Compensation Aligns the NEOs with the Interests of Stockholders. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee has designed the compensation for NEOs to depend on the achievement of objective performance goals that drive and are aligned with stockholder value. Information related to the amount of NEO compensation that is paid as RSUs, SARs and performance shares is described in the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” section in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of this proxy statement. |
| • | Hedging and Trading Restrictions.The Company has an Insider Trading Policy that prohibits directors, officers |
Reasonable and Limited Perquisites and Other Benefits. The limited amount of benefits and perquisites offered to the NEOs is common with companies in our industry and is reasonable in both nature and amount.
| • | Reasonable and Limited Perquisites and Other Benefits. The limited amount of benefits and perquisites offered to the NEOs is common with companies in our industry and is reasonable in both nature and amount. |
No Severance/Change-in-Control Agreements. None of the NEOs have any arrangement that provides for severance payments. Additionally, none of the NEOs are entitled to payment of any benefits upon a change-in-control.
| • | No Standing Severance/Change-in-Control Agreements. None of the NEOs have any arrangement that provides for cash severance payments. Additionally, none of the NEOs are entitled to payment of any benefits upon a change-in-control (other than potential equity award vesting). |
As summarized above, the compensation earned by the Company’s NEOs for 20172023 was generally aligned with both the Company’s pay for performance philosophy and 20172023 Company performance. You should read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the compensation tables in this proxy statement in determining whether to approve this proposal. For the reasons discussed above, and elsewhere in this proxy statement, the Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote to approve the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.
PROPOSAL: The Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote, on an advisory basis, FOR the approval of the above resolution relating toapproving the compensation of the Company’s NEOs.
53
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
In 2017, the Company’s Audit Committee was comprised of the following Non-Employee Directors: Mr. Boyce, Mr. Dearth, Dr. Delgado, Mr. Lawton, Ms. Reed and Mr. Wehmer. During 2017, Mr. Wehmer served as Chairman of the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee has:
(a) | reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte, the independent registered public accounting firm appointed by the Board of Directors, the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, |
(b) | discussed with |
(c) | received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from |
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20172023, be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.2023.
Michael R. Boyce
Randall S. Dearth
Joaquin Delgado
Gregory E. Lawton
Jan Stern Reed
Edward J. Wehmer
The information contained in the Audit Committee Report above shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.
54
PROPOSAL NO. 3: RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2024
The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for 2024. Stockholder ratification of the selection of Deloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2024 is not required by our By-laws or otherwise. However, the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of Deloitte for stockholder ratification as a matter of good corporate governance practice. The Audit Committee will take the results of the stockholder vote regarding Deloitte’s appointment into consideration in future deliberations. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
A representative of Deloitte is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement, and to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
PROPOSAL: Upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors recommends that the stockholders vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company and its subsidiaries for fiscal year 2024.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees
The following table presents fees and out-of-pocket expenses for professional audit services rendered by Deloitte for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, and fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte during those periods:
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||
Audit Fees (a) | $ | 2,554,600 | $ | 2,140,500 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees (b) | $ | 298,600 | $ | 270,900 | ||||
Tax Fees (c) | $ | 380,700 | $ | 536,000 | ||||
All Other Fees (d) | $ | 1,900 | $ | 1,900 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Total | $ | 3,235,800 | $ | 2,949,300 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| (a) | Audit services consist of the audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements, |
| (b) | Audit-Related Fees consist of transactional due diligence support and fees
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (c) |
|
55
Pre-Approval Policy
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing, setting compensation for and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has established a policy requiring the pre-approval of all audit, audit-related, and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. The policy provides guidance as to the specific services that the independent registered public accounting firm may perform for the Company. The policy requires that a description of the services expected to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, together with an estimate of fees, be provided to the Audit Committee for approval on an annual basis. The scope of these services is carefully considered by the Audit Committee to ensure such services are consistent with applicable rules on auditor independence.
Any requests for audit, audit-related, and non-audit services not previously authorized must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval. Normally, pre-approval is provided at regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings. However, the policy delegates to the Chair or another designated member of the Audit Committee the authority to grant specific pre-approval between meetings provided that the Chair or designated member reports any pre-approval decision to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
All of the services related to the Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees described above were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with its pre-approval requirements.
56
2025 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
In order for proposals from Company stockholders to be included in the Proxy Statement and Form of Proxy for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8, the Company must receive the proposals at its headquarters at 1101 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois 60062, no later than November 26, 2024.
A stockholder that intends to nominate a candidate for election as a director or to present business at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 must comply with the requirements set forth in the Company’s By-laws. Among other things, a stockholder must give written notice containing the information required by the Company’s By-laws, which must be received by the Secretary of the Company not earlier than 120 days nor later than 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders. Therefore, because the 2024 Annual Meeting is scheduled for April 30, 2024, the Company’s Secretary must receive the requisite notice and information for a nomination of a candidate for director or a stockholder proposal submitted other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8 no earlier than December 31, 2024, nor later than January 30, 2025.
In the event the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after the anniversary date of the 2024 Annual Meeting, then the foregoing notices required by the Company’s By-laws, to be timely, must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which notice of the 2025 Annual Meeting is first given to stockholders or public disclosure of such meeting is made, whichever first occurs.
Universal Proxy Rules for Director Nominations
In addition to satisfying the requirements under the Company’s By-laws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act (including a statement that such stockholder intends to solicit the holders of shares representing at least 67% of the voting power of the Company’s shares entitled to vote on the election of directors in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees), which notice must be postmarked or transmitted electronically to the Company at its headquarters no later than 60 calendar days prior to the anniversary date of the 2024 Annual Meeting (for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, no later than March 3, 2025 (the first business day following March 1, 2025)). However, if the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting is changed by more than 30 calendar days from such anniversary date, then notice must be provided by the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting or the 10th calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting is first made.
COMMUNICATIONS FOR ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
A stockholder or other interested party may communicate with the Board of Directors by writing c/o Secretary’s Office, Stepan Company, 1101 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois 60062. Mail addressed to a specific director or Board committee will be delivered to that director or Board committee. The Secretary initially reviews all correspondence to directors and delivers the correspondence to the addressee, as appropriate. Correspondence that is unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board will not be distributed to the Board, including spam, product complaints or inquiries, new product suggestions, resumes or job inquiries, advertisements or any inappropriate communications.
57
ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS
The Company has filed an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 with the SEC. Stockholders may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K by writing to Stepan Company, Secretary’s Office, Edens Expressway and Winnetka Road, Northfield, Illinois 60093. Copies of exhibits will be provided upon request and payment of a nominal fee equal to the Company’s expense in furnishing such exhibits. The Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, with the SEC. Stockholders may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K by writing to Stepan Company, Secretary’s Office, 1101 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois 60062. Copies of exhibits will be provided upon request and payment of a nominal fee equal to the Company’s expense in furnishing such exhibits. The Company’s 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K is also available at http://www.edocumentview.com/SCL.
By order of the Board of Directors, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Northbrook, Illinois
March 26, 2024
58
Appendix A
Discussion and Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The Company believes that certain non-GAAP measures, when presented in conjunction with comparable GAAP measures, help investors’ ability to understand underlying trends in the Company’s operating performance and provide useful information to both management and investors by excluding items that may not be indicative of the Company’s core operating results. Internally, the Company uses certain non-GAAP information as an indicator of business performance and evaluates management’s effectiveness with specific reference to these indicators. In addition, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors uses certain non-GAAP measures, including Corporate Net Income and ROIC, as targets under the Company’s short-term and long-term incentive compensation programs. These measures should be considered in addition to, not a substitute for or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, other companies may calculate adjusted net income and such other metrics differently than the Company does, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.
Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income to Adjusted Net Income
The following table reconciles the Company’s GAAP net income to adjusted net income. Adjusted net income is used as an incentive compensation performance metric, as discussed below. The cumulative tax effect of the adjustment items was calculated using the statutory tax rates for the jurisdictions in which the transaction occurred.
| Twelve Months Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| (In millions, except per share amounts) | 2023 | EPS | 2022 | EPS | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Net Income Attributable to the Company as Reported | $ | 40.2 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 147.2 | $ | 6.38 | ||||||||
Deferred Compensation (Income) Expense | (0.7 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (0.14) | |||||||||
Business Restructuring and Asset Impairment Expense | 12.0 | 0.52 | 0.3 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and Other Intangibles Impairment Expense | 2.0 | 0.09 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Cash-Settled SARs (Income) Expense | (0.1 | ) | — | (0.4 | ) | (0.01) | ||||||||||
Environmental Remediation Expense | 1.0 | 0.04 | 11.5 | 0.50 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative Tax Effect on Above Adjustment Items | (3.7 | ) | (0.16 | ) | (2.0 | ) | (0.09) | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Adjusted Net Income | $ | 50.7 | $ | 2.21 | $ | 153.5 | $ | 6.65 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
Use of Non-GAAP Corporate Net Income for Compensation Purposes
The Company used adjusted net income (calculated in accordance with the table set forth above) as the 2023 Corporate Net Income incentive compensation performance metric.
Definition of Non-GAAP Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
To calculate the Return on Invested Capital incentive compensation performance metric, the Company divides net operating profit after taxes (“NOPAT”) by invested capital. The Company calculates NOPAT by adding the Corporate Net Income Adjustments to pre-tax income and subtracting the effect of income taxes. The Company calculates invested capital by adding the 12-month average trade accounts receivable balance to the 12-month average FIFO inventory balance and subtracting the 12-month average trade accounts payable balance plus the January 1 net property, plant and equipment and other non-current assets balance.
A-1
Stepan ® Vote C123456789 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext ENDORSEMENT_LINE SACKPACK 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000001 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. [X] Your vote matters – here’s how to vote! You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Votes submitted electronically must be received by 1:00 a.m., (ET), on April 30, 2024. Online Go to www.envisionreports.com/SCL or scan the QR code – login details are located in the shaded bar below. Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/SCL 2024 Annual Meeting Proxy Card 1234 5678 9012 345 IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. A Proposals – The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all nominees and FOR A Proposals 2 and 3. 1. Election of Directors: + For Against Abstain 01 - Randall S. Dearth [ ] [ ] [ ] For Against Abstain 02 - Susan M. Lewis [ ] [ ] [ ] For Against Abstain 03 - Jan Stern Reed [ ] [ ] [ ] For Against Abstain 2. Advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation. [ ] [ ] [ ] For Against Abstain 3. Ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Stepan Company’s independent public accounting firm for 2024. [ ] [ ] [ ] B Authorized Signatures – This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) – Please print date below. / / Signature 1 – Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 – Please keep signature within the box. C 1234567890 J N T MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND 1 P C F 6 0 3 1 7 0 03YTOB +
2024 Annual Meeting of Stepan Company Stockholders April 30, 2024, 9:00 a.m. CT Stepan Company Headquarters 1101 Skokie Boulevard, Northbrook, Illinois Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The material is available at: www.envisionreports.com/SCL Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.envisionreports.com/SCL IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Stepan Company + Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting – April 30, 2024 David G. Kabbes and Luis E. Rojo, or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Stepan Company to be held on April 30, 2024 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the stockholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR the election of all director nominees and FOR items 2 and 3. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) C Non-Voting Items Change of Address – Please print new address below. Comments – Please print your comments below. +
